On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 9:23 AM, Greg Rundlett (freephile) <
g...@freephile.com> wrote:
> http://devdocs.io/ can be used as an alternative until the manual is back
> online
>
> /me having a conversation with myself
And the site is back http://php.net/
Greg Rundlett
__
http://devdocs.io/ can be used as an alternative until the manual is back
online
Greg Rundlett
___
New York PHP User Group Community Talk Mailing List
http://lists.nyphp.org/mailman/listinfo/talk
http://www.nyphp.org/show-participation
There seems to be some confusion on the part of php.net devs about why the
site is being flagged. But, they've removed some code in 5 files
https://github.com/php/web-php/commit/8e87088c3f51b594dc7d7ed71115d215a7acf78b
And requested a review by Google
http://productforums.google.com/forum/#!topic
Firefox will let you actually go to the page, if you click around a bit.
However, I'm not fond of the comment on php.net anyway. I'd rather folks
put in tickets to grow the actual documentation vice putting a bunch of
confusing comments in the bottom.
On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 8:38 AM, Greg Ru
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6604156 uncovers the problem...
Somehow some obfuscated javascrip was injected into a userprefs.js file
which in turn loads an iframe that loads the malware.
Greg Rundlett
On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 8:38 AM, Greg Rundlett (freephile) <
g...@freephile.com> wrote
Here is the diagnostic.
http://www.google.com/safebrowsing/diagnostic?site=php.net
Which appears to imply that comments posted in the manual are linking to
sites which contain malware. That's bad.
And people talking about it:
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2013/10/24/php_site_malware_warning_flap
