In the end, I canned all the frameworks. And built my own.
They are just so, so, so overkill. IMHO.
But I digress, and I am not helping you at all. But there is a big Cake user
group off the main site, probably a quick answer there.
MVC sounds SO great in academic circles, but in the end, some
On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 5:25 PM, Randal Rust wrote:
> OK, so I'm almost done with getting the basics of this site done
and you can ignore my request about the routing. i figured it out. i
had updated the .htaccess under the /app/ folder, not the root of the
directory.
--
Randal Rust
R.Squared C
I'm all for CakePHP - as a developer I use it on about 90% of the
PHP-based projects I work on. It makes developing easier and
maintenance a breeze. Like all things programming, though, it has it's
uses and one can use it in situation where better alternatives exist.
- Brian D.
On Fri, Jun 6, 200
On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 3:13 PM, Tim Lieberman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Oh, and use the 1.2 branch, even though it's only just now at RC1.
+1 on this one. There are some good improvements in 1.2 that make life
a lot easier.
If I were to start a project and had to choose a PHP-based MVC
framewo
On Jun 6, 2008, at 12:07 PM, Matt Juszczak wrote:
One of my clients wants to do some development with this - I
haven't used it. What do you all think of it?
Meh ... It's an MVC framework. The controller and view stuff is
alright. The Model concept works but is a little frustrating at tim
A good interview ...
http://devzone.zend.com/article/2349-PHP-Abstract-Podcast-Episode-11-
Opinionated-Software
-snip-
Today’s special guest is Chris Hartjes. Chris has been building PHP
applications since 1998. Currently employed as a Senior Developer for
the Cake Development Corporation,
@ this point it really depends on what you are looking to do, for the
most basic stuff you can use either, 1.2 comes w/ more behaviors and
helpers and a nice Memcache engine for more advanced usage. Umm
ConsoleShell is 1.2 and a few other niceties.
Just keep you eyes peeled + im sure using
Congratulations to the team, it is well deserved.
Brian Dailey wrote:
I use this on a (semi-)daily basis, so I'm glad to see the CakePHP
devs getting some more attention. I can't wait until the stable 1.2
release!
http://www.seomoz.org/web2.0#cat_51
"Cake is a rapid development framework for
Congrats to Nate 2.0 and the whole team ...
On May 10, 2007, at 3:17 PM, Brian Dailey wrote:
I use this on a (semi-)daily basis, so I'm glad to see the CakePHP
devs getting some more attention. I can't wait until the stable 1.2
release!
http://www.seomoz.org/web2.0#cat_51
"Cake is a rapid
Jon,
Should I point you to the correct acquisitions editor? ;-)
Regards,
jeff
On 1/5/07, Jon Baer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think this depends on what you are comparing it to, Ive heard the
same discussion come up @ least twice before in comparison to Rails
and its worth pointing out that t
I think this depends on what you are comparing it to, Ive heard the
same discussion come up @ least twice before in comparison to Rails
and its worth pointing out that the Ruby language in and of itself
comes with both a) documentation tool (rdoc) and b) unit testing
framework already.
IM
Paul Houle wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does anyone use the Cakephp framework? If you do, I have tried using
thier session component to create and manage sessions. I have read
every bit of information I can find on the internet. I still can't
get my sessions working correctly. Please tea
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does anyone use the Cakephp framework? If you do, I have tried using
thier session component to create and manage sessions. I have read
every bit of information I can find on the internet. I still can't
get my sessions working correctly. Please teach me.
I avoid s
13 matches
Mail list logo
