yeah YAY TO FIREBUG!!!? I hear though that FF 3 is way better; it's what i
hear :) so don't quote me on that.
~rob
-Original Message-
From: David Mintz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: NYPHP Talk
Sent: Thu, 8 May 2008 12:29 pm
Subject: Re: [nyphp-talk] Trapping JS er
Amen to that -- Firebug is an immense help. Indispensable, even, if you are
doing Ajax and need to inspect the stuff coming back at you. Too bad FF 2.x
is such a prolifigate hog and waster of memory -- it's really killing me
here on Fedora 7.
On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 6:49 PM, Tim Lieberman <[EMAIL P
At 8:25 AM -0700 5/7/08, Kristina Anderson wrote:
PS special thanks to Tedd for testing the script for me.
Also, I've forwarded this thread to the person who designed the HTML
forms for this project.
Is there any reason to prefer label tags over using id, or is either
one fine going forward?
PS special thanks to Tedd for testing the script for me.
Also, I've forwarded this thread to the person who designed the HTML
forms for this project.
Is there any reason to prefer label tags over using id, or is either
one fine going forward?
--Kristina
> Hi everyone -- thanks again for help
Hi everyone -- thanks again for help and just wanted to let you know
what the issue ended up being.
If a label tag with for= is not used, then name= & id= must both be
used inside the tag, as Javascript uses id & PHP uses name.
-- Kristina
> ed,
>
> it calls the subfunctions like so:
>
ed,
it calls the subfunctions like so:
reason += validateUsername(theForm.user_name);
reason += validatePassword(theForm.pwd);
reason += validateEmail(theForm.email1);
reason += validatePhone(theForm.phone1);
reason += validateEmpty(theForm.first_name);
which appears to be OK
> Well th
Well that's different... if the Javascript is 'looping' over the form
array as so:
function check(){
fld = document.getElementById('test').value.length ;
alert(fld);
}
function loopForms(){
var frms = document.forms ;
for(a=0;a
At 6:52 PM -0700 5/6/08, Kristina Anderson wrote:
Rolan,
I found this one that looked very easy to expand at
http://www.webcheatsheet.com/javascript/form_validation.php
However it is not picking up the blank fields...
blank fields ?
I must not be understanding this -- doesn't validateEmpty
it's implicitly referenced, i.e. the name of the element is being
passed in as an enumerated value assigned to the type of validation
subroutine I want to call for that element.
But by "by id" i guess that there needs to be an id="sameasname" in
each form element...?? That could be the issue?
That's correct Javascript, assuming that fld =
document.getElementById('the element you are referencing')
Kristina Anderson wrote:
if (fld.value.length == 0) {
is that even right?
I thought it used to be fld.length or fld.text.length...??
Kristina
Rolan,
I found this one that loo
if (fld.value.length == 0) {
is that even right?
I thought it used to be fld.length or fld.text.length...??
Kristina
> Rolan,
>
> I found this one that looked very easy to expand at
>
> http://www.webcheatsheet.com/javascript/form_validation.php
>
> However it is not picking up the blan
Rolan,
I found this one that looked very easy to expand at
http://www.webcheatsheet.com/javascript/form_validation.php
However it is not picking up the blank fields...
I can try yours if you point me to it!
I need something that is extensible to handle the various types of
input like emails,
which one are you using? FormChek.js is easy and hasn't let me down yet.
~Rolan
___
New York PHP Community Talk Mailing List
http://lists.nyphp.org/mailman/listinfo/talk
NYPHPCon 2006 Presentations Online
http://www.nyphpcon.com
Show Your Participatio
Also: Firebug is your friend. Just set a breakpoint on the first
line of your function, and step through.
-Tim
On May 6, 2008, at 4:25 PM, Kristina Anderson wrote:
thanks!! will do.
On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 5:59 PM, Kristina Anderson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi everyone --
I'm try
thanks!! will do.
> On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 5:59 PM, Kristina Anderson
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Hi everyone --
> >
> > I'm trying to build out a validation routine for my input forms and
> > found something that I like/find easy to extend. I added it as an
> > external script to
On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 5:59 PM, Kristina Anderson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi everyone --
>
> I'm trying to build out a validation routine for my input forms and
> found something that I like/find easy to extend. I added it as an
> external script to my test page. I tested to make sure
16 matches
Mail list logo