On 3/16/17, Vaughan Dodd via Talk wrote:
> Aspects of this probably do make sense.
>
> However: third party screen reader development is expensive and is
> continuously being challenged by Microsoft and other software players.
>
> development with respect to
Aspects of this probably do make sense.
However: third party screen reader development is expensive and is continuously
being challenged by Microsoft and other software players.
development with respect to Window-Eyes being in decline is in large measure
due to the Window-Eyes for Office
yes that could work. then we'd also have touch support, braille support
and stuff. but still as far as i know, no contracted braille input from
braille displays.
On 3/16/2017 11:23 AM, Brenda wrote:
Josh, that may well happen, but...
What about those of us who don't use Windows Office? On
Josh, that may well happen, but...
What about those of us who don't use Windows Office? On my win 10
machine I use Jart or notepad or wordpad. I don't like jowls and don't
want to and can't afford to pay for it.
Since Microsoft has already worked with GW to connect Window-eyes with
yes i agree. but its worth a shot none the less.
On 3/16/2017 10:32 AM, Reeva Webb wrote:
Don't hold your breath for this to happen.
"the world has been against you from day one, tomorrow's never
promised night has just begun, so sing with me we're all fucked" Walls
Of Jericho
Reeva
Don't hold your breath for this to happen.
"the world has been against you from day one, tomorrow's never promised
night has just begun, so sing with me we're all fucked" Walls Of Jericho
Reeva
On Mar 16, 2017 9:29 AM, "Joshua Kennedy via Talk" <
talk@lists.window-eyes.com> wrote:
> hi
>
hi
Since we have window-eyes for office I think now VFO also should come
out with a jaws for office or just take window-eyes and fold it into a
jaws for office. because window-eyes does not have touch support, jaws
does. jaws has the best OCR, window-eyes does not. and they could just
port