Re: [OSM-talk] [Tagging] Introducing Taginfo

2010-10-12 Thread Sebastian Klein
Jochen Topf wrote: On Tue, Oct 05, 2010 at 04:46:26PM +0200, Pieren wrote: If I could have one request, it would be nice to see the amount of different contributors using the same tag. This to distinguish between quantity and popularity. I know it might be challenging since we should only count

Re: [OSM-talk] Bot amended relations today

2010-10-12 Thread Dave F.
On 12/10/2010 18:20, Werner Hoch wrote: Type=route sometimes describes the way (road, railway, waterway) I believe this to be incorrect usage. The route wiki page is *very* clear (first paragraph) on it's usage. You should not use the route tag to describe the 'infrastructure' of a way. C

Re: [OSM-talk] "source" tag: on "empty" nodes too?

2010-10-12 Thread Emilie Laffray
On 12 October 2010 19:20, Chris Browet wrote: > I am wondering (in the context of adding automatic "source" in merkaartor): > > When drawing over a map source requiring attribution (e.g. SpotMaps > France), do we have to add the "source" tag to "empty" nodes (i.e. nodes > whose only purpose is to

[OSM-talk] "source" tag: on "empty" nodes too?

2010-10-12 Thread Chris Browet
I am wondering (in the context of adding automatic "source" in merkaartor): When drawing over a map source requiring attribution (e.g. SpotMaps France), do we have to add the "source" tag to "empty" nodes (i.e. nodes whose only purpose is to define a way), too? - Chris - _

Re: [OSM-talk] Bot amended relations today

2010-10-12 Thread Werner Hoch
Hi Dave, On Dienstag, 12. Oktober 2010, Dave F. wrote: > On 05/10/2010 10:44, Werner Hoch wrote: > > The change DaveF doesn't like is the change of the tags > > > >type=route route=canal > > > > into: > >type=waterway waterway=canal > > > > I thought this change is correct, as the wat

Re: [OSM-talk] Vote for Icons on Open MapQuest sites

2010-10-12 Thread Dave F.
On 12/10/2010 16:31, Coast, Hurricane wrote: You asked, we listened, and now the vote it open to you! To me, all of those listed are relevant. The ability to zoom in negates any problem with icons obscuring the map. Cheers Dave F. ___ talk mail

[OSM-talk] Vote for Icons on Open MapQuest sites

2010-10-12 Thread Coast, Hurricane
You asked, we listened, and now the vote it open to you! Vote for your favorite POI icon to be shown on open.mapquest.co.uk and all other language specific sites. By opening up the choices to the community, we aim to gain a crowd sourced answer to what the most r

Re: [OSM-talk] Bot amended relations today

2010-10-12 Thread Richard Mann
Railways also can have separate "service" and "infrastructure" relations. As indeed can roads (in places where roads can have multiple refs) Richard On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 1:25 PM, Dave F. wrote: >  On 05/10/2010 10:44, Werner Hoch wrote: >> >> The change DaveF doesn't like is the change of the

Re: [OSM-talk] Bot amended relations today

2010-10-12 Thread Dave F.
On 05/10/2010 10:44, Werner Hoch wrote: The change DaveF doesn't like is the change of the tags type=route route=canal into: type=waterway waterway=canal I thought this change is correct, as the waterway relations are usually used to describe the waterway, This is not a waterway relatio