On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 8:22 PM, Daniel Sabo wrote:
> The new river rendering at z7 to z10 is a little extreme.
> e.g.
> http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=40.27&lon=-123.61&zoom=7&layers=M
> http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=40.269&lon=-123.611&zoom=9&layers=M
>
> Are the lines supposed to be this
The new river rendering at z7 to z10 is a little extreme.
e.g.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=40.27&lon=-123.61&zoom=7&layers=M
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=40.269&lon=-123.611&zoom=9&layers=M
Are the lines supposed to be this thick?
___
talk ma
to the list as well
On 22 Mar 2011 16:58, "Kevin Peat" wrote:
>
>
> On 22 Mar 2011 10:41, "David Groom" wrote:>
> >>
> >> Robin's point stands - should we mark the low water mark and the high
> >> water mark and render the littoral zone differently?
> >> I guess it is part of the micro-mapping i
Thank you thank you thank you!
I will silently wait and check if the flood dries...
With humble respect,
Milo
2011/3/22, Vladimir Vyskocil :
> I also found a self intersection of the coastline and removed it.
>
> Vlad.
>
> On 22 mars 2011, at 05:49, Toby Murray wrote:
>
>> The wiki indicates th
- Original Message -
From: "Elizabeth Dodd"
To:
Sent: Monday, March 21, 2011 10:19 PM
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] the coastline
On Mon, 21 Mar 2011 21:59:20 -
"Andy Robinson" wrote:
I'd place the coastline at the low water mark because you know then
that its always true. The c
I also found a self intersection of the coastline and removed it.
Vlad.
On 22 mars 2011, at 05:49, Toby Murray wrote:
> The wiki indicates that natural=coastline should only be used on ways.
> You seem to have removed it from the ways and added it to the Aruba
> island border relation. Being in
I put back natural=coastline on the ways, I hope I didn't missed a part.
Vlad.
On 22 mars 2011, at 05:49, Toby Murray wrote:
> The wiki indicates that natural=coastline should only be used on ways.
> You seem to have removed it from the ways and added it to the Aruba
> island border relation. Be
7 matches
Mail list logo