[OSM-talk] Fw: new message

2015-10-10 Thread Phil The Geek Wyatt
Hello! New message, please read Phil The Geek Wyatt ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

[OSM-talk] Fw: new message

2015-10-10 Thread ingalls
Hello! New message, please read ingalls ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Re: [OSM-talk] User WJtW - railway track counts

2015-10-10 Thread Michael Reichert
Hi Colin, Am 2015-10-10 um 14:07 schrieb Colin Smale: > Oh by the way, user WJtW is still at it, most recently in Italy, filling > in loads of detail tags on railways. No idea where the information comes > from. But every segment he touches has tracks=N added, often with N>1 on > routes already ma

Re: [OSM-talk] User WJtW - railway track counts

2015-10-10 Thread Colin Smale
Oh by the way, user WJtW is still at it, most recently in Italy, filling in loads of detail tags on railways. No idea where the information comes from. But every segment he touches has tracks=N added, often with N>1 on routes already mapped with individual tracks. @Michael Reichart, did you ge

Re: [OSM-talk] User WJtW - railway track counts

2015-10-10 Thread Colin Smale
Exactly, this is the core of the "complaint" about WJtW's work. However, tracks=* is an accepted shortcut, somewhere between a single way for the whole group and mapping individual tracks. Getting the individual tracks right, with all the points/switches, sidings, crossovers etc is a helluva j

Re: [OSM-talk] User WJtW - railway track counts

2015-10-10 Thread Paul Johnson
On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 2:20 AM, Colin Smale wrote: > > User WJtW[1] has been making large numbers of edits to railways across > Europe in the past few months, all with the changeset comment > "Electrified". Most of them are adding tags like gauge=1435 which may well > be right (although I have no