[Talk-dk] highway=bus_stop og public_transport=platform

Før dette breder sig for meget: Jeg har set en lille tendens hvor highway=bus_stop også bliver tagget med public_transport=platform. Dette er selvfølgelig helt på sin plads på steder hvor der ikke findes en egentlig platform, og hvor selve standeren må gøre det ud for stedets platform (et

Re: [talk-au] Sidewalk vs Footpath?

> As much as it irks me to have Americanisms creep into our language (and it > irks me a great deal!), I agree with you - sidewalk is more definitive. Here, here. I'll concede, have changed it back to sidewalk. On Fri, 21 Sep 2018 at 09:21, wrote: > > As much as it irks me to have Americanisms

Re: [OSM-talk] Waterway rel with mix of line & poly

On 21/09/18 06:11, Jem wrote: Thank you both. That's very helpful. On Thu, 20 Sep 2018 at 22:25, Dave F > wrote: Hi Short answer: Yes There's a few problems here: Relations should not be used to collect thing together. ? That is what

Re: [talk-au] Sidewalk vs Footpath?

As much as it irks me to have Americanisms creep into our language (and it irks me a great deal!), I agree with you - sidewalk is more definitive. -- Message: 1 Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2018 20:57:05 +1000 From: Andrew Harvey To:

Re: [OSM-talk] OSM Wikibase is now live

Everyone, please ignore the "don't edit or translate the label" restriction. There is now a dedicated ID P16 property. We can change label to be more useful to the new editors, e.g. "name in English" instead of "name:en" Thanks! On Thu, Sep 20, 2018, 18:01 Shu Higashi wrote: > Hi Yuri,

Re: [OSM-talk] OSM Wikibase is now live

Hi Yuri, thanks for offering this feature. > When editing, please do not > change or translate the "label" > field. Only use description field for > the translation efforts, Can you please explain the reason for this? Is it both the label of items and properties that should not be translated?

Re: [Talk-GB] MapThePaths: lagginess in Firefox 62.0 - use Chrome for now

Can confirm. It's also occurring in Overpass Turbo. An alternative to using Chrome is to: Download an older version of Firefox from FileHippo https://filehippo.com/download_firefox_64/ In your current FIrefox turn off auto updates Options>General (Scroll Down) Uninstall Firefox Load old

Re: [talk-au] Sidewalk vs Footpath?

On Thu, 20 Sep 2018 at 20:59, Andrew Harvey wrote: > Personally I refer to the path next to the road designed for > pedestrians as the footpath, assuming sidewalk is an american term not > really used in Australian English. > I agree entirely! > At the moment iD has two presets "Foot path"

Re: [Talk-GB] 'historic' county boundaries added to the database

On 20/09/2018 19:44, Mark Goodge wrote: Then get involved and put it in OHM. I was involved, but the current OHM development is not going in a way that works well with OSM so I gave up. I'd rather mirror OSM directly and add my historic material to that local copy! Which is what I'm doing

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Arceaux partagés motos / vélos

Le 20. 09. 18 à 17:24, Phyks a écrit : > stationnements "deux roues" >     amenity=motorcycle_parking on en avait discuté de mémoire l'an passé c'est ce qui en était resorti considérant que qui peux le plus peux le moins. quitte à proposer un nouvel icone mixte moto+velo si >    

Re: [Talk-cz] Kdy bude na openstreetmap.cz aktuální mapa?

čt 20. 9. 2018 v 15:50 odesílatel Tom Ka napsal: > Dne 20. září 2018 13:25 xkomc...@centrum.cz > napsal(a): > > Kdyz to (za sebe) shrnu, tak jednoducha mapa pro prvne prichozi ktera > je zaroven dobre pouzitelna pro dalsi vrstvy (jako chybne rozcestniky > treba :-) ). Druha zajimava varianta je

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] PLU et copie des informations

Il me semble que les PLU n'existent plus depuis qu'ils ont été transférés aux intercommunalités. Ils restent en vigueur dfans leur état mais les intercommunaltiés doivent le réviser (en plus du fait qu'ils doivent aussi faire l'objet d'une évalutation obligatoire au bout d'au maximum 6 ans sinon

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Arceaux partagés motos / vélos

Bonjour, Le 20/09/2018 à 17:54, djakk djakk a écrit : > Est-ce l’occasion d’utiliser le point-virgule pour faire une liste ? > amenity=motorcycle_parking;bicycle_parking (utilisé une trentaine de fois > selon taginfo) C'est la solution qu j'ai retenue lorsque j'ai représenté ce type

Re: [Talk-it-trentino] Nuovo utente

Il 20/09/2018 22:53, Francesco Pelullo ha scritto: Ciao a tutti e bentrovati, è il mio primo post in questa lista. Mi sono trasferito da poco a Rovereto, il livello di informazioni presenti nella mappa di OSM è impressionante, spero abbiate lasciato qualcosa da mappare anche a me. Ciao

[Talk-it-trentino] Nuovo utente

Ciao a tutti e bentrovati, è il mio primo post in questa lista. Mi sono trasferito da poco a Rovereto, il livello di informazioni presenti nella mappa di OSM è impressionante, spero abbiate lasciato qualcosa da mappare anche a me. Ciao /niubii/ ___

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Le site de l'association OSM-FR fait peau neuve

Le 03/09/2018 à 14:10, François Lacombe a écrit : > L'ergonomie a été complètement revue et une carte avec différents rendus a > été ajoutée à la page d'accueil. Je viens de visiter quelques pages du site et oui je confirme que l'ergonomie a été amélioré. C'est plutôt une bonne chose car

Re: [Talk-it-lazio] Il 24/09/2018, ripartiamo con gli incontri mensili?

Ottima iniziativa Tommaso, io ci sto. Ciao, Martin sent from a phone > On 20. Sep 2018, at 14:17, pelatom wrote: > > Ciao ragazzi :-) bentrovati > è ormai un po che non ci incontriamo. L'estate è finita e sono ricominciati > gli impegni, ma spero che abbiamo ancora voglia di incontrarci per

Re: [OSM-talk] Waterway rel with mix of line & poly

Thank you both. That's very helpful. On Thu, 20 Sep 2018 at 22:25, Dave F wrote: > Hi > > Short answer: Yes > > There's a few problems here: > > Relations should not be used to collect thing together. > There shouldn't be tags on the ways which conflict with those in the > relations > MP

Re: [Talk-cz] Kdy bude na openstreetmap.cz aktuální mapa?

On Thu, 20 Sep 2018 at 20:59, Marián Kyral wrote: > On 9/20/18 8:27 PM, Michal Poupa wrote: > > A jak tedy funguje? Zadám co chci hledat dám entr a nic se nestane > > > Zadám co chci, počkám a vyberu z nabídky. > Ale jinak souhlas, chce to vylepšit. Nemá někdo čas?. > No právě, přesně tak.

Re: [Talk-cz] Kdy bude na openstreetmap.cz aktuální mapa?

On 9/20/18 8:27 PM, Michal Poupa wrote: > A jak tedy funguje? Zadám co chci hledat dám entr a nic se nestane > Zadám co chci, počkám a vyberu z nabídky. Ale jinak souhlas, chce to vylepšit. Nemá někdo čas?. Marián > 20. 9. 2018 v 19:17, Jan Macura >: > >> Ahoj,

Re: [Talk-cz] Kdy bude na openstreetmap.cz aktuální mapa?

Jen drobný postřeh, na osmap.cz používám vrstvu "mapnik" právě kvůli aktuálnosti. Teď to funguje dost podivně, prohlížím vrstvu Mapnik, když zmáčknu vložit fotku, samo se to přepne na wikimedii. Tak to má být, nebo je to chyba? Díky.

Re: [Talk-GB] 'historic' county boundaries added to the database

On 20/09/2018 18:16, Lester Caine wrote: On 20/09/2018 17:50, Mark Goodge wrote: In fact, putting them in OSM isn't just damaging to OSM, it's damaging to OHM. At the moment, OHM is a bit sparse, there are some well-mapped areas but there are some pretty big blank areas. What it really needs

Re: [Talk-cz] Kdy bude na openstreetmap.cz aktuální mapa?

A jak tedy funguje? Zadám co chci hledat dám entr a nic se nestane 20. 9. 2018 v 19:17, Jan Macura : > Ahoj, > >> On Thu, 20 Sep 2018 at 13:33, Michal Poupa wrote: >> (...) Víte že tam nefunguje vyhledávánání - to co je vlevo u zoomu? > > Vyhledávání funguje, jenom možná trochu jinak,

Re: [Talk-ca] Proposition d'import pour les arrêts d'autobus de EXO

Bonjour et merci Marc. Je vais tester (sans sauver les mises à jour) cette méthode, adapterai ma proposition avec les détails et la resoumettrai pour discussion. Dès que j'airai l'autorisation de Exo je ferai un premier test sur un petit réseau. Encore merci, Claude -Message

Re: [Talk-GB] 'historic' county boundaries added to the database

Stuart Reynolds wrote: > I propose that we refer this to the OSM UK Directors and ask > them to review the arguments for both sides and come to a > firm decision. That’s what we elected them for, after all. Then > they publish it, and that is what we all agree to accept, > whether it matches

Re: [Talk-GB] 'historic' county boundaries added to the database

Hi, If these boundaries were purely of historical interest I doubt that you'd find many experienced contributors arguing for their inclusion in OSM. The argument is that these areas retain a continued cultural geographic relevance. People with no particularinterest in history can and do still

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] PLU et copie des informations

Le jeu. 20 sept. 2018 à 18:59, deuzeffe a écrit : > De mémoire il y a une directive/règlement/loi/décret/whatever qui oblige > entre autres les coll. terr. ayant plus de X agents et regroupant plus > de Y habitants à mettre en OD des éléments "d'intérêt" (yes, DEFINE > "d'intérêt", I know.

Re: [Talk-cz] Kdy bude na openstreetmap.cz aktuální mapa?

Ahoj, On Thu, 20 Sep 2018 at 13:20, Tom Ka wrote: > (...) a vyhozen Mapnik ze zakladnich > vrstev pro BFU. > co? proč? to nikdo nechtěl. Jakou jinou mapu prezentovat BFU, než mapu vytvořenou samotnou OSMF? Podle mě OSM Carto už je v současnosti povedená mapa a jeden z těch hezčích a

Re: [Talk-cz] Kdy bude na openstreetmap.cz aktuální mapa?

Ahoj, On Thu, 20 Sep 2018 at 13:33, Michal Poupa wrote: > (...) Víte že tam nefunguje vyhledávánání - to co je vlevo u zoomu? > Vyhledávání funguje, jenom možná trochu jinak, než je uživatel zvyklý třeba z mapy.cz.. H. ___ Talk-cz mailing list

Re: [Talk-GB] 'historic' county boundaries added to the database

On 20/09/2018 17:50, Mark Goodge wrote: In fact, putting them in OSM isn't just damaging to OSM, it's damaging to OHM. At the moment, OHM is a bit sparse, there are some well-mapped areas but there are some pretty big blank areas. What it really needs is a group of enthusiastic contributors,

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] PLU et copie des informations

De mémoire il y a une directive/règlement/loi/décret/whatever qui oblige entre autres les coll. terr. ayant plus de X agents et regroupant plus de Y habitants à mettre en OD des éléments "d'intérêt" (yes, DEFINE "d'intérêt", I know. Bref). Est-ce qu'un PLU(I) entre dans ce cadre là ? (je veux

Re: [Talk-GB] 'historic' county boundaries added to the database

On 20/09/2018 16:37, Dan S wrote: Op do 20 sep. 2018 om 16:31 schreef Mark Goodge : However, historic administrative boundaries, by definition, are not current. They're not an edge case. They are completely outside the realms of what is current. Your "by definition" seems to be about

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] nouveau champ takeaway:lunchbox

Bonjour, Effectivement, je reconnais que la définition de "VRAC" que je donne est trop restrictive à propos du libre-service. Concernant le débat entre la dénomination "bulk_purchase", "loose_sales" et "whole_sale", cela concerne bien la vente en vrac. Le sujet "lunch_box" porte en fait

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Arceaux partagés motos / vélos

Salut ! J’ai quelque idées : Est-ce l’occasion d’utiliser le point-virgule pour faire une liste ? amenity=motorcycle_parking;bicycle_parking (utilisé une trentaine de fois selon taginfo) Ou une nouvelle valeur : amenity=motorcycle_and_bicycle_parking Ou revoir la méthode : amenity=parking

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] nouveau champ takeaway:lunchbox

Note: pour les hyper, la vente en vrac en libre-service ne permet pas facilement la réutilisation des emballages apportés par les clients. Bref ils mettent à disposition quand même des emballages, mais souvent fragiles (en papier, mais souvent encore en plastique, hormis les fruits-et-légumes

Re: [Talk-GB] 'historic' county boundaries added to the database

Op do 20 sep. 2018 om 16:31 schreef Mark Goodge : > > > > On 20/09/2018 13:46, Martin Wynne wrote: > > On 20/09/2018 13:12, Dave F wrote: > >> See the OSM Welcome page. > > > > Thanks. The wording there is: > > > > "OpenStreetMap is a place for mapping things that are both real and > > current." >

Re: [talk-au] Sidewalk vs Footpath?

> > In iD for me at least, paths next to roads are called "Pavement". I > agree with this terminology the most and think it was a mistake for OSM > to adapt the footway=sidewalk tag. > >From my experience "pavement" in the road transport industry commonly refers to the road pavement or road

Re: [Talk-GB] 'historic' county boundaries added to the database

On 20/09/2018 13:46, Martin Wynne wrote: On 20/09/2018 13:12, Dave F wrote: See the OSM Welcome page. Thanks. The wording there is: "OpenStreetMap is a place for mapping things that are both real and current." Unfortunately it doesn't define "real" or "current". No, it leaves those to

[OSM-talk-fr] Arceaux partagés motos / vélos

Salut, Dans ma ville, la plupart des stationnements "vélos" sont en fait des stationnements "deux roues" avec des arceaux qui sont utilisables à la fois par les motos, les scooters et les vélos (sans distinction). Comment devrait-on tagger cela au mieux ? Il me semble qu'une proposition

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Parc de stationnement en Zone de rencontre

Le 18/09/2018 à 20:19, Gwenaël Jouvin a écrit : > Mettre un parc de stationnement en zone de rencontre, on aura vraiment tout > vu ! > Ces aménageurs sont vraiment prêts à tout pour qu’on n’y comprenne plus rien… > à se demander si eux-mêmes y comprennent quoi que ce soit. > > Bref, à mon avis,

Re: [Talk-es] Asociación juvenil: grupos scout

Hola, Alejandro. En mi opinión, Citycentro es un centro comunitario y debería etiquetarse con «amenity=community_centre» y «community_centre:for=juvenile» en todo caso, no como un club. En su página web se definen como un «centro juvenil» [1]. Lo que si puedes hacer es combinar ambos esquemas de

Re: [Talk-GB] 'historic' county boundaries added to the database

Stuart wrote: > I propose that we refer this to the OSM UK Directors and ask them > to review the arguments for both sides and come to a firm decision. > That’s what we elected them for, after all. I didn't. I thought OSM UK was to promote OSM in the UK, not decide what we can and can't map.

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] nouveau champ takeaway:lunchbox

Bonjour Philippe, Ce n'est pas du tout ce que j'observe en Pays de la Loire. C'est vrai que les gros hyper ont parfois du mal en dehors de Super U parce qu'il faut un nettoyage régulier des distributeurs. Mais de nombreux rayons vrac en libre service de magasins se créent (je n'ai pas de

Re: [Talk-GB] 'historic' county boundaries added to the database

I’m all for debate and coming to a consensus, but my message counter has got to 108 mails in this thread, and I have to say that from where I am sitting it’s all becoming rather tedious. The same arguments (albeit polite) are being rehashed, nothing new is being said, and no-one is showing any

Re: [Talk-cz] Kdy bude na openstreetmap.cz aktuální mapa?

Dne 20. září 2018 13:25 xkomc...@centrum.cz napsal(a): > Prvně bych si spíš položil otázku, k čemu má ta defaultní mapa být: souhlas, chtel jsem to aspon nejak posunout, kdyz je evidentne shoda aspon na tom, ze Mapbox ne. > - zobrazovat co nejvíc dat z OSM? urcite ne > - vhodná k přidání

Re: [Talk-es] Asociación juvenil: grupos scout

He puesto el ejemplo de los scout y ha sido un mal ejemplo. En la wiki pone esto: club=youth Un club exclusivo para gente jóvenes De escaso interés, usa en su lugar: amenity

Re: [Talk-GB] 'historic' county boundaries added to the database

On 19/09/2018 23:01, Richard Fairhurst wrote: Frederik Ramm wrote: It still is one today. So there's no problem, then. So: Historic counties can and often do represent genuine, attested, useful geographic information. If you're proposing to delete them, you need to come up with a

Re: [Talk-GB] 'historic' county boundaries added to the database

On 20/09/2018 13:24, Colin Smale wrote: On 2018-09-20 14:12, Dave F wrote: See the OSM Welcome page. Quoting the law does not make a person guilty. Misunderstanding 'the law' doesn't prove 'innocence'. If it were that simple these boundaries would have been removed long ago. Being

Re: [Talk-GB] 'historic' county boundaries added to the database

On 20/09/2018 13:12, Dave F wrote: See the OSM Welcome page. Thanks. The wording there is: "OpenStreetMap is a place for mapping things that are both real and current." Unfortunately it doesn't define "real" or "current". What is a "real" bus stop? Does it need a physical marker post or

Re: [talk-au] Sidewalk vs Footpath?

In iD for me at least, paths next to roads are called "Pavement". I agree with this terminology the most and think it was a mistake for OSM to adapt the footway=sidewalk tag. On 20/9/18 8:57 pm, Andrew Harvey wrote: > Personally I refer to the path next to the road designed for > pedestrians as

Re: [Talk-es] Asociación juvenil: grupos scout

Hola, Alejandro. En el wiki tienes información específica sobre cómo mapear un grupo /scout/, «club=scout» [1]. Clubs juveniles de otro tipo también puede mapearse usando la clave «club».Consulta la documentación de la clave «club» para más detalles [2]. . [1]

Re: [Talk-GB] 'historic' county boundaries added to the database

On 2018-09-20 14:12, Dave F wrote: > See the OSM Welcome page. Quoting the law does not make a person guilty. If it were that simple these boundaries would have been removed long ago. Are you offering to delete these boundaries then? As far as I can see there is no "decision" in this case

Re: [OSM-talk] Waterway rel with mix of line & poly

Hi Short answer: Yes There's a few problems here: Relations should not be used to collect thing together. There shouldn't be tags on the ways which conflict with those in the relations MP relations require a 'type' tags and 'inners' & 'outers' roles In this case the Southern section

[OSM-talk-fr] Rencontre contributeurs de Montrouge et du Sud de Paris

Hello, La première rencontre des contributeurs *habitants Montrouge et alentours* aura lieu le 10 octobre 2018 au Schmilblick à partir de 18h. Cette première rencontre permettra de nous présenter les uns les autres et d'envisager des projets locaux

[Talk-it-lazio] Il 24/09/2018, ripartiamo con gli incontri mensili?

Ciao ragazzi :-) bentrovati è ormai un po che non ci incontriamo. L'estate è finita e sono ricominciati gli impegni, ma spero che abbiamo ancora voglia di incontrarci per mappare in giro. Il 24 è il classico ultimo lunedì del mese, se ci vogliamo incontrare sono disponibile. Che ne dite? -

Re: [Talk-GB] 'historic' county boundaries added to the database

See the OSM Welcome page. On 20/09/2018 13:00, Martin Wynne wrote: The argument against the historic county boundaries is that they can't be verified on the ground. No, Martyn. It's that they are not current. Make up your minds! Previously: > > On 09/19/2018 06:38 PM, Martin Wynne wrote:

Re: [Talk-GB] 'historic' county boundaries added to the database

Sure (green tick): https://www.openstreetmap.org/welcome On 20/09/2018 12:52, Colin Smale wrote: On 2018-09-20 13:22, Dave F wrote: As I noted previously, many discussions have been had & a decision made. The discussion is clearly ongoing Could you point me to the "decision" please?

Re: [Talk-GB] 'historic' county boundaries added to the database

On 20/09/18 20:53, Martin Wynne wrote: How can you verify it's the same stream? I can't.  I've deleted it. This raises the question of the maximum length of a culvert under a road, beyond which it is no longer permissible to map it as such. Under a country lane is ok? But under a motorway?

Re: [Talk-GB] 'historic' county boundaries added to the database

I think Richard as usually eloquently summarised my position. Rutland is perhaps an extreme example insofar as more-or-less the entire population objected to the county disappearing. However such cases are not uncommon across the world: of the top of my head, I can think of the city of Allegheny

Re: [Talk-GB] 'historic' county boundaries added to the database

The argument against the historic county boundaries is that they can't be verified on the ground. No, Martyn. It's that they are not current. Make up your minds! Previously: > > On 09/19/2018 06:38 PM, Martin Wynne wrote: > > I'm puzzled by this insistence that we can map only that which >

Re: [Talk-GB] 'historic' county boundaries added to the database

On 2018-09-20 13:22, Dave F wrote: > As I noted previously, many discussions have been had & a decision made. The discussion is clearly ongoing Could you point me to the "decision" please?___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org

Re: [Talk-GB] 'historic' county boundaries added to the database

On 20/09/2018 12:07, Martin Wynne wrote: The argument against the historic county boundaries is that they can't be verified on the ground. No, Martyn. It's that they are not current. Current boundaries aren't visible on the ground either. No one's painted dashed lines across the fields,

Re: [Talk-cz] Kdy bude na openstreetmap.cz aktuální mapa?

to je asi lepší. Víte že tam nefunguje vyhledávánání - to co je vlevo u zoomu? Dne 20. září 2018 13:20 Tom Ka napsal(a): > OK, default nastaven na Wikipedia mapu a vyhozen Mapnik ze zakladnich > vrstev pro BFU. > > Bye > > Dne 20. září 2018 13:15 majka napsal(a): >> Klidně zatím na tu wikimedia

Re: [Talk-cz] Kdy bude na openstreetmap.cz aktuální mapa?

Prvně bych si spíš položil otázku, k čemu má ta defaultní mapa být: - zobrazovat co nejvíc dat z OSM? - vhodná k přidání vlastní vrstvy dat? - zvýrazňovat nějaká konkrétní data (turistické trasy, železniční sítě, ...)? - být graficky příjemná? - ladid k designu webu? - ...? A podle toho

Re: [Talk-cz] Kdy bude na openstreetmap.cz aktuální mapa?

OK, default nastaven na Wikipedia mapu a vyhozen Mapnik ze zakladnich vrstev pro BFU. Bye Dne 20. září 2018 13:15 majka napsal(a): > Klidně zatím na tu wikimedia map. Opticky mi přijde nejpodobnější. > Majka > > On Thu, 20 Sep 2018 at 13:13, Tom Ka wrote: >> >> OK, no problem - takze na co

Re: [Talk-cz] Kdy bude na openstreetmap.cz aktuální mapa?

Klidně zatím na tu wikimedia map. Opticky mi přijde nejpodobnější. Majka On Thu, 20 Sep 2018 at 13:13, Tom Ka wrote: > OK, no problem - takze na co prehodit? > > Dne 20. září 2018 12:58 majka napsal(a): > > Já bych byla pro to, ten default jednoznačně přehodit na něco, co se > > aktualizuje

Re: [Talk-cz] Kdy bude na openstreetmap.cz aktuální mapa?

OK, no problem - takze na co prehodit? Dne 20. září 2018 12:58 majka napsal(a): > Já bych byla pro to, ten default jednoznačně přehodit na něco, co se > aktualizuje často. > > Protože ten Mapbox tak, jak ho máme, je opravdu moc a moc neaktuální. Skoro > bych byla pro, tuhle mapu (v tomhle

Re: [Talk-GB] 'historic' county boundaries added to the database

Poohsticks. (How did the conversation get to this...) The argument against the historic county boundaries is that they can't be verified on the ground. I map lots of stuff that can't be verified on the ground. For example rural bus stops often have no physical marker. Martin.

Re: [Talk-GB] 'historic' county boundaries added to the database

On 20/09/2018 11:57, Dan S wrote: Poohsticks. (How did the conversation get to this...) OSM threads *always* go off track, often from the first reply. Could we all please /try/ to keep on topic, or start a new thread? Cheers DaveF ___ Talk-GB

Re: [Talk-GB] 'historic' county boundaries added to the database

Do we map pipelines? Or just the visible markers? What is the correct tagging for this: Sorry, forget that. I found: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:pipeline%3Dmarker Martin. ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org

Re: [Talk-cz] Kdy bude na openstreetmap.cz aktuální mapa?

ne je default teď jsem to zkoušel na virtuálu když na to skočím prvně je tam tato neaktuální mapa ... Dne 20. září 2018 12:41 majka napsal(a): > A neměla by se BFU zobrazovat ta wikimedia map? Protože to (a ten Mapbox) se > tu řešilo. > Tohle spíš vypadá na to, že sis ten Mapbox nastavil a od té

Re: [Talk-cz] Kdy bude na openstreetmap.cz aktuální mapa?

Jeste pro ostatni pridam dostupne mapy od Klokana: https://www.maptiler.com/maps/#bright//raster/9.68/16.5128/49.1827 Tohle by asi podle Jirky slo pouzit celkem snadno a pokud jsem to dobre pochopil, vsechny jsou aktualizovany tydne. A jeste pripomenu mapy/vrstvy generovane na osm.fit.vutbr.cz

Re: [Talk-cz] Kdy bude na openstreetmap.cz aktuální mapa?

Já bych byla pro to, ten default jednoznačně přehodit na něco, co se aktualizuje často. Protože ten Mapbox tak, jak ho máme, je opravdu moc a moc neaktuální. Skoro bych byla pro, tuhle mapu (v tomhle provedení) komplet vyhodit, mapa několik let stará mi připadá kontraproduktivní. Majka On Thu,

[talk-au] Sidewalk vs Footpath?

Personally I refer to the path next to the road designed for pedestrians as the footpath, assuming sidewalk is an american term not really used in Australian English. So I had set the translation of "sidewalk" in the iD editor for Australian English to Footpath, however it seems this is causing

Re: [Talk-GB] 'historic' county boundaries added to the database

Op do 20 sep. 2018 om 09:46 schreef Colin Smale : > > On 2018-09-20 10:25, Martin Wynne wrote: > > But I can't verify that fact. Should I not map it at all? What is verifiable > on the ground is the fact that the stream does not stop dead at one location > and restart at another. > > How can you

Re: [Talk-GB] 'historic' county boundaries added to the database

How can you verify it's the same stream? I can't. I've deleted it. This raises the question of the maximum length of a culvert under a road, beyond which it is no longer permissible to map it as such. Under a country lane is ok? But under a motorway? What is a stream? Even if it's the

Re: [Talk-cz] Kdy bude na openstreetmap.cz aktuální mapa?

Ahoj, Majko - resilo ale nedoresilo - kdyz z toho bude nejaky zaver, klidne nastaveni co je default mapa upravim. Jirko - mam v planu se na to mrknout, ale neni to jen zmena default mapy, tak to je zatim na ukolnicku. Bye Dne 20. září 2018 12:41 majka napsal(a): > A neměla by se BFU

Re: [Talk-cz] Kdy bude na openstreetmap.cz aktuální mapa?

Znovu připomenu, že náš Free plan na MapTiler Cloudu mohou používat i open-source a open-data komunity: https://www.maptiler.com/cloud/plans/ (a od konce května to zahrnuje i rastrové dlaždice) Mapbox je nyní defaultní volba (lze vyzkoušet v anonymním okně) On 20.9.2018 12:41, majka wrote: A

Re: [Talk-cz] Kdy bude na openstreetmap.cz aktuální mapa?

A neměla by se BFU zobrazovat ta wikimedia map? Protože to (a ten Mapbox) se tu řešilo. Tohle spíš vypadá na to, že sis ten Mapbox nastavil a od té doby Ti tam drží, nebo sis na něj přepnul extra. Majka On Thu, 20 Sep 2018 at 12:36, Michal Poupa wrote: > obávám se že BFU tedy běžný Franat

Re: [Talk-cz] Kdy bude na openstreetmap.cz aktuální mapa?

obávám se že BFU tedy běžný Franat uřivatel toto neví a neřeší a jen to kazí pověst OFM které má podle mne jedny z nejlepších map... (pokud jsou tedy aktuální) ... Dne 20. září 2018 12:31 majka napsal(a): > > On Thu, 20 Sep 2018 at 12:20, Michal Poupa wrote: >> >> To nikomu z komunity OSM

Re: [Talk-cz] Kdy bude na openstreetmap.cz aktuální mapa?

On Thu, 20 Sep 2018 at 12:20, Michal Poupa wrote: > To nikomu z komunity OSM nevadí že jsou na webu openstreetmap.cz cca > rok dva staré mapy? > Vzhledem k tomu, že ty mapy openstreetmap.cz přebírá, tak zrovna tohle je třeba řešit tam, odkud ty mapy jsou. Ono by tu stačilo taky přepnout do

[Talk-cz] Kdy bude na openstreetmap.cz aktuální mapa?

Dobrý den, netušíte kdy bude konečně na webu openstreetmap.cz aktuální mapa? například kruhový objezd v Aši https://openstreetmap.cz/#map=18/50.21999/12.19883=x který je tam snad více než rok na mapě není... Přitom pokud jdu sem https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/50.21998/12.19824 tak

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] légende OSM ?

Il me semble que dans JOSM il y avait la possibilité d'import du RPG par département. Es-ce toujours le cas? Le jeu. 20 sept. 2018 à 10:27, Marc SIBERT a écrit : > Bonjour, > > Effectivement, ça sent la suppression de polygone CLC. Il reste encore des > résidus de contours : > >

Re: [Talk-GB] 'historic' county boundaries added to the database

On 2018-09-20 10:25, Martin Wynne wrote: > But I can't verify that fact. Should I not map it at all? What is verifiable > on the ground is the fact that the stream does not stop dead at one location > and restart at another. How can you verify it's the same stream? Taking your own flourescein

Re: [Talk-dk] Vejnumre

Alle danske adressepunkter importeres og opdateres automatisk fra Danmarks Adresseregister, se https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/AutoAWS Mht. vejkoder er der ikke kutyme for at angive disse i OSM, da de ikke umiddelbart er specielt brugbare. On 19/09/2018 21:17, Troels Arvin wrote: Hej,

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] légende OSM ?

Bonjour, Effectivement, ça sent la suppression de polygone CLC. Il reste encore des résidus de contours : https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/182037298 https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/182037300 Pour les plus courageux, l'IGN a publié le RPG

Re: [Talk-GB] 'historic' county boundaries added to the database

it is one of our basic principles and it's here to stay. Usually people don't say "current or real" but "verifiable on the ground". The fundamental idea goes like this: If two mappers disagree about a feature, they can simply go there and the conflict can be solved immediately. "Verifiable on

Re: [Talk-GB] 'historic' county boundaries added to the database

On 20/09/2018 07:24, Frederik Ramm wrote: Surely your argument which seems to be based on the romantic "Rutland that people feel in their hearts" could not be applied as a reason to store "Rutland County Council District Council in the borders of 1997", plus "Rutland County Council District

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] légende OSM ?

Cool Je parlais de ça en rendu fr https://screenshots.firefox.com/NdhgwwdtvcQHH7Wv/layers.openstreetmap.fr et ça en rendu org https://screenshots.firefox.com/UKPxLlBkNdCWzoUW/www.openstreetmap.org mais merci Philippe pour ces explications fleuve sur la gestion des caches. J'y apporterais bien

Re: [Talk-cz] tag symbol

Ahoj, ve specifikaci (ani stare ani novejsi): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:WikiProjekt_%C4%8Cesko/Edita%C4%8Dn%C3%AD_standardy_a_konvence#Turistick.C3.A9_zna.C4.8Den.C3.AD neni symbol vubec uveden, bezne se pokud vim nezadava. Jedine info o jeho hodnote jsem tak nasel:

Re: [Talk-cz] tag symbol

On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 7:30 AM kayle wrote: > Mam jednu technicku k tagu symbol napr. pri tychto relacia. > https://osm.org/relation/88829 > https://osm.org/relation/1241440 > > Nemali by mat miesto symbol=red, ci symbol=yellow skor symbol=major > (pripadne iny, podla typu znacky)? > Podla

[OSM-talk-fr] Nouvelle proposition Toll_Gantry

Bonjour, Voici une nouvelle proposition de tag qui complète les péages existant. Elle est en vote actuellement. Personnellement elle me satisfait pas crar il il a déjà une autre proposition de tag grantry et qu'on peut aussi y adjoindre les info de type toll dessus. C'est discuté sur la tagging

Re: [Talk-GB] 'historic' county boundaries added to the database

Richard, On 20.09.2018 00:01, Richard Fairhurst wrote: > From 1974 to 1997, the county of Rutland didn't exist. It's nice to see such a passionate plea for one particular historic boundary, and pleas like that are what can give rise to the exceptions I was talking about. These exceptions do

Re: [Talk-GB] 1947 Boundaries

Hi Rob, Sorry, it was late. The 1 inch maps don't explicitly show rural district boundaries (though they do show the individual parishes) nor do they name the areas, so might be of limited use to you. The nearest in date 6 or 25 inch map should be your best bet (the boundaries didn't change much

[Talk-es] Asociación juvenil

Leyendo amenity:club en la wiki veo que no se recomienda para etiquetar clubes juveniles. Para mí el mejor etiquetado para una asociación juvenil (por ejemplo un grupo scout) es precisamente amenity:club. ¿Es este etiquetado correcto? Un saludo. ___