Abandoned is a tricky concept for a path, what make is abandoned? If there
is a sign up saying track closed or keep out for re-vegetation it's clear,
but otherwise it's less clear.
On Sat, 26 Sep 2020 at 01:36, Andy Townsend wrote:
> Once it's definitely disappeared, I'd have no qualms about del
On 25/09/2020 17:43, Dave F via talk wrote:
Nick's description is "overgrown, unclear, prone to flooding"
These are all subjective interpretations.
There are many official PROW's in those conditions.
(for the benefit of people outside of England and Wales a "public right
of way" is a special
Nick's description is "overgrown, unclear, prone to flooding"
These are all subjective interpretations.
There are many official PROW's in those conditions.
It doesn't mean they're "abandoned" or "disused".
It doesn't mean someone isn't prepared to wade or hack their way through.
Accurate descrip
I use:
disused:highway=path/footway/etc
or
abandoned:highway=path/footway/etc
If it is totally gone, I still tend to leave the way with "note=There is no
longer a path here, the land manager restored the area to its natural state
sometime before ", (or whatever is appropriate) this provides some
a
On 25/09/2020 16:04, Nick Whitelegg wrote:
Hi,
Wondering if there was a consensus on tagging an abandoned, no longer
very usable path (e.g. a path which has become overgrown or is unclear
and prone to flooding in wetter periods). Something like "path=abandoned"?
My 2p:
Perhaps use "trail_
Hi,
Wondering if there was a consensus on tagging an abandoned, no longer very
usable path (e.g. a path which has become overgrown or is unclear and prone to
flooding in wetter periods). Something like "path=abandoned"?
There's a case like that near where I am in which a path was mapped in the
Hi,
So I was one of the original complainants of Grab/Global Logic mapping
efforts.
It seems so far that they're doing much better now. We collaborated on a
workflow that aims for zero defects and no assumptions by remote mappers.
They have a decent writeup of their methods and workflows over her
This thread is literally a request for someone to name one of the companies
that is "doing it right".
Yes, people complain more than they compliment. It's alas human nature. This
thread is an attempt to correct that. So to those saying some companies do it,
right: Can you please give examples?
8 matches
Mail list logo