Re: [OSM-talk] Extending the 'geo:' uri scheme: Adding parameter 'osmid'

Am Mo., 2. Jan. 2023 um 22:03 Uhr schrieb Andy Townsend : > It's certainly possible (as I've said in that discussion) to use OSM IDs > as "stable enough to do real work with" - I do it all the time. > > Can I guarantee that the shop at "No 55 Main Street" will always have > the same OSM ID? No,

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] bac à marée

Un gros conteneur à déchets ménagers se tague aussi avec : amenity=recycling recycling_type=container Si tu regardes la liste, tu trouveras un certain Marc_marc utilisant ça pour les composteurs qui font du sous-cyclage ;-). À la rigueur un amenity=waste_disposal (ce n'est pas une poubelle mais

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] bac à marée

Bonne année 2023 un conteneur mais qui n'est pas un dispositif de recyclage donc perso cela me semble plutôt être amenity=waste_basket ou amenity=waste_disposal au vu de la photo https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:amenity%3Dwaste_disposal

Re: [OSM-talk] Extending the 'geo:' uri scheme: Adding parameter 'osmid'

On 02/01/2023 20:44, Mateusz Konieczny via talk wrote: way/node/relation ids in OSM are unstable, not promised to be stable and anything relying on their stability can break at any point Unfortunately, that sort of "black and white" answer doesn't really answer the question of whether it's

Re: [OSM-talk] Extending the 'geo:' uri scheme: Adding parameter 'osmid'

On 1/2/23 11:57, Sören Reinecke wrote: Hey, It came into my mind to get IETF to standardize a parameter explicitly linking to osm objects with their corresponding type and id. [...] Would it make sense for Google Maps, Bing Maps, etc to have similar schemes under the geo URI scheme? I don't

Re: [OSM-talk] Extending the 'geo:' uri scheme: Adding parameter 'osmid'

I'll state even more strongly than Frederik just did: "linking to an OSM object by ID and expecting the ID to remain constant is asking for trouble" is putting it mildly. It IS trouble. All it takes is one single change to one single datum and boom, the assumption that doing so can work is

Re: [OSM-talk] Extending the 'geo:' uri scheme: Adding parameter 'osmid'

Jan 2, 2023, 18:57 by valin...@gmx.net: > > Our own parameter could have the following syntax: > > > > > osmid=(N|W|R) > > > > > What do you think? > > way/node/relation ids in OSM are unstable, not promised to be stable and anything relying on their stability can break at any point

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] bac à marée

Bonsoir, Le 02.01.23 à 19:52, osm.sanspourr...@spamgourmet.com a écrit : Justification : amenity=recycling recycling_type=container car ce sont des conteneurs. Ceux qui collectent ne font pas la différence suivant l'usage ultime (recyclage peu probable ici ! valorisation thermique ou

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] bac à marée

(message mis à jour grâce au retour de pulsati0n sur une de mes modifications). Bonjour, vu l'inhomogénéité des données dans OSM, j'ai fait une passe. J'ai mis : amenity=recycling recycling_type=container opening_hours=24/7 description=Bac à marée (pour les déchets marins d'origine anthropique

Re: [OSM-talk] Extending the 'geo:' uri scheme: Adding parameter 'osmid'

Hi, On 1/2/23 18:57, Sören Reinecke wrote: As OpenStreetMap is playing an important part in the geospatial world, the OSMF should try to get IETF convinced. Until now we've concentrated on making a good map, rather than convincing others that our map is good ;) I think that linking to OSM

[OSM-talk] Extending the 'geo:' uri scheme: Adding parameter 'osmid'

Hey, It came into my mind to get IETF to standardize a parameter explicitly linking to osm objects with their corresponding type and id. The 'geo' URI scheme is standardized as RFC 5870 with examples of usage