Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Mapbox contribute ?

So "Imrove this map" does not mean anymore "Improve the OSM data used for the base map that covers 99% of my screen" ? Can you confirm this Mapbox move ? Le 14/03/2023 à 19:05, Sergey Beliamei a écrit : Hello, Christian! All POI and addresses in France are not from OSM. Mapbox follows ODbL

[OSM-talk-fr] [édition mécanique] sidewalk=none -> sidewalk=no en France

Bonjour, je propose l'édition de masse suivante : remplacement de sidewalk=none par sidewalk=no sur les objets way ayant un tag highway en France cette modification est cohérente avec le wiki, les habitudes d'osm (=no pour l'absence) et les préset de josm (iD n'a pas de preset à ce sujet et ne

Re: [OSM-talk] Duplicate Buildings

Hi Marc, I created a csv file available on wetranser for 7 days. It contains 901 quadruplets. For each line, the 4 OSM id's (similar to Frederik list) + the 4 dates of edit. See https://we.tl/t-rt9KSsZXBD The osm-id list below refers to 77 buildings (ways) with level, layer or building:part

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Mapbox contribute ?

Le 14/03/2023 à 19:05, Sergey Beliamei via Talk-fr a écrit : All POI and addresses in France are not from OSM. Mapbox follows ODbL and does not mix internal data with OSM. Soit on est dans la mauvaise foi, soit dans une incapacité totale de comprendre le problème. Le sujet de cette demande

[OSM-talk] proposed bot edit for surface=granite, surface=marble and similar

There is noticeable (but not very high) number of surface=granite / surface=marble and other similar tagging type of stone into surface tag. --- There was some discussion on

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Mapbox contribute ?

Hello, Christian! All POI and addresses in France are not from OSM. Mapbox follows ODbL and does not mix internal data with OSM. Best regards, Member of Mapbox team, Sergey Salut, Christian! Tous les POI et adresses en France ne proviennent pas d'OSM. Mapbox suit ODbL et ne mélange pas les

Re: [OSM-talk] Duplicate Buildings

Marc, I will revise and share data. First, below are the instructions to extract relations metadata with [out:csv(::changeset, ::timestamp,::user, ::type, ::id, building, highway, level, layer, 'building:part', 'building:roof')]; relation(id: 3240506, 3240507, 3240508, 3240509, 3240510,

Re: [OSM-talk] Duplicate Buildings

Le 14.03.23 à 13:45, Pierre Béland via talk a écrit : I imported the osm metadata using overpass can youu share it to avoid having to make it again :) Simple Building duplicates from the same contributor are the easy ones to correct. yes, on the condition that you can easily detect when

Re: [OSM-talk] Duplicate Buildings

Using id's from the Frederick quadruplicate list, I imported the osm metadata using overpass. Note thate the negative values in the list represent relations. The table below shows that the majority of quadruplicate cases implicate only one contributor. Simple Building duplicates from the same

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Mapbox contribute ?

Le 13/03/2023 à 14:42, Sergey Beliamei a écrit : Hello! The clickable POIs that are seen on the map are not extracted from the OSM. Mapbox uses a variety of sources to keep POIs updated. Please bear in mind that these POIs are not associated with OSM and could be found either via search bar