Hello!
New message, please read <http://iamakeupartistry.com/difference.php?h>
Henry Haselgrove
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, 9 March 2015 5:32 AM
To: Henry Haselgrove
Cc: Alex Sims; OSM Australian Talk List
Subject: Re: [talk-au] Using roads dataset from data.sa.gov.au
So, after doing this manually for a bit; it's generally working well.
There are some where spot checking against other
Well spotted, Alex. It is interesting that both of the errors you have found
have been in the “type” part of the name (e.g., street/lane/terrace etc). There
seems to be approximately 1000 roads where the difference between the OSM and
datasa versions is the type (excluding cases that could
I have put the Matlab scripts here:
https://github.com/q-bits/osm-scripts
From: Alex Sims [mailto:a...@softgrow.com]
Sent: Sunday, 22 February 2015 8:16 PM
To: OSM Australian Talk List
Subject: Re: [talk-au] Using roads dataset from data.sa.gov.au
Hi,
Can you
From: Daniel O'Connor [mailto:daniel.ocon...@gmail.com]
Softgrow has done some work in metro Adelaide around checking roads:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_South_Australia
Thanks. I had seen the edits Softgrow has done, but I wasn’t aware it was
documented anywhere
From:
Hi everyone,
I have recently been looking at the roads dataset on data.sa.gov.au, and
trying to figure out if there is a good way to use it in OSM.
One thing I have tried so far is to process the data in a manner that
identifies roads that are missing or incorrectly tagged in OSM. The
Hello,
I wanted to let you know that I have adjusted my plans based on feedback from
this list and from the “imports” list. Here is a summary of the changes:
1. I will tag all dams as water=reservoir instead of water=pond. Most
existing dams in SA are tagged this way anyway. A dam seems
!
Henry
From: Daniel O'Connor [mailto:daniel.ocon...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, 20 January 2015 10:33 PM
To: Henry Haselgrove
Cc: talk-au@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [talk-au] Proposed import of SA waterbodies data
Secondly, is it better to do 4x imports for each feature set; starting
8 matches
Mail list logo