become unmatched over time, as OSM
changes, e.g. a way is split or paths added that add more detail.
Martin, ** CycleStreets - For Cyclists, By Cyclists
Developer, CycleStreets ** https://www.cyclestreets.net/
___
Talk-GB mailing
would lean to using a separate highway=cycleway,
not least because it's easier then to put proper metadata on it.
Martin, ** CycleStreets - For Cyclists, By Cyclists
Developer, CycleStreets ** https://www.cyclestreets.net
that
isn't asphalt makes it worthwhile putting the surface in explicitly. This
demonstrates to future mappers that the value is actually known (rather
than assumed/unknown/ambiguous).
Martin, ** CycleStreets - For Cyclists, By Cyclists
Developer, CycleStreets ** https
nearby, making it very safe to
ensure these would be safe to import.)
Martin, ** CycleStreets - For Cyclists, By Cyclists
Developer, CycleStreets ** https://www.cyclestreets.net/
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB
of
cycling data layer buttons on the right-hand side.
Martin, ** CycleStreets - For Cyclists, By Cyclists
Developer, CycleStreets ** https://www.cyclestreets.net/
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
lation of the relevants parts of the data into OSM:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/TfL_Cycling_Infrastructure_Database
but in the meanwhile it is considered important to keep the current dataset
maintained.)
Martin, ** CycleStreets - For Cyclists, By Cyclists
Developer, CycleS
to
ensure this.
Yes, good point. With such a large dataset, setting a timescale to ensure
that momentum can be maintained would be sensible. Clearly it would
depending on resources/time/willingness. I've included a new sentence to
this effect.
Martin, ** CycleStreets
following with the other types when that is successful, is
a good idea.
Martin, ** CycleStreets - For Cyclists, By Cyclists
Developer, CycleStreets ** https://www.cyclestreets.net/
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap
of the 24 data package areas.
iii. Seek community input as this work proceeds.
iv. Import the data and fix up issues arising from feedback.
v. Report back to the OSM community.
vi. Produce a final report for TfL confirming completion of the activity.
Martin
Just to say that I've turned all the comments (here and on Twitter) into
issues and replies at:
https://github.com/cyclestreets/tflcid-conversion/issues
I'll merge the changes into the conversion webpage shortly.
Martin, ** CycleStreets - For Cyclists, By Cyclists
On Fri, 20 Sep 2019, Martin - CycleStreets wrote:
What are people's thoughts about these suggested new tags?
Thanks so much everyone for all the great comments.
I'll be replying on these as soon as I get a chance later this week and
merging the changes in, after a busy week following
which has no physical markings/layout but permits
contraflow cycling, so is not technically an asset and thus not represented
in the CID) to transfer this meaning onto the road itself.
https://bikedata.cyclestreets.net/tflcid/conversion/#ss_name
Martin, ** CycleStreets
e, is a bit of a work
in progress - I'm aware the ID links aren't yet activated, and the Browse
map link isn't yet picking up the field (only the type). I'll fix these
shortly.
Martin, ** CycleStreets - For Cyclists, By Cyclists
Develop
On Fri, 2 Aug 2019, Martin - CycleStreets wrote:
I've sent a follow-up e-mail to the OSMF Licensing Working Group, which
compiles all the various statements from Transport for London, and
includes various e-mails where these statements were originally made, so
that the LWG will hopefully
I get from them,
once they've looked at the various e-mails, and checked my interpretation
of these, and then hopefully given a clear statement. (Naturally, until
that happens, we should not be conflating any data.)
Martin, ** CycleStreets - For Cyclists, By Cyclists
I'll update on that tomorrow. It is looking good to me, but I'm
seeking a definitive view from the OSMF LWG now that I've obtained full
details of the provenance of the data. This has taken a bit longer than
hoped.
Martin, ** CycleStreets - For Cyclists, By Cyclists
to add it on their behalf?
(They're a non-profit community partnership run by volunteers so there's no
money on the table but it would be a nice thing to add to the map.)
Martin, ** CycleStreets - For Cyclists, By Cyclists
Developer, CycleStreets ** http
of the
earliest to be surveyed 3-4 years ago.
Which area(s) have you found to be inaccurate, out of interest?
I've even seen data for NCN 4 that's illegal where it suggests a right
hand turn but is explicitly denied by signs.
There aren't any turn restrictions in the data as far as I'm aware.
Martin
=carstyleId=1opened_tab=1
Nor does Mapquest:
http://mapq.st/LpyFSJ
Nor CycleStreets, incidentally:
http://www.cyclestreets.net/journey/2878501/
using an import dated Wed, 11 Jul 2012 15:33:15.
Martin, ** CycleStreets - For Cyclists, By Cyclists
Developer, CycleStreets
a little time merging their city.
Just follow this link and click on the first button to enter editing for
Bristol:
http://bristol.cyclestreets.net/edit/locate/
Martin, ** CycleStreets - For Cyclists, By Cyclists
Developer, CycleStreets ** http://www.cyclestreets.net
/pipermail/talk-gb/2012-January/012764.html
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/2012-March/012900.html
[2] http://www.cyclestreets.net/blog/2012/05/20/more-osm-tags-supported/
Martin, ** CycleStreets - For Cyclists, By Cyclists
Developer, CycleStreets
://www.cyclestreets.net/blog/2012/05/20/more-osm-tags-supported/
Based on the feedback we've seen recently these changes are already
improving the quality of routes served to users, and so addition of more of
this kind of data to OSM would be very welcome.
Martin, ** CycleStreets
and details in it apply elsewhere too.)
We'd like to thank Cycling Scotland for their support!
Martin, ** CycleStreets - For Cyclists, By Cyclists
Developer, CycleStreets ** http://www.cyclestreets.net/
___
Talk-GB mailing
.
but this sounds a bit scary to me, especially as the Essex node seems to be
quite well-established. I can't see how it is affecting Greenwich, and I
can't see that London is being included for Greenwich.
Would someone kindly be able to have a look at this?
Martin, ** CycleStreets
width and
gradient of the towpath and GPS-linked photographs of the locations. Once
the map is live on www.waterscape.com, members of the public will be able
to add updates, providing an up-to-the-minute picture of the condition of
the towpaths.
Martin, ** CycleStreets
community elsewhere, too, even
though it will of course be tailored for Scotland.)
We'll be asking round the OSM community soon for suggestions for content
and for someone/people who can be commissioned to work on this guide.
Martin, ** CycleStreets - For Cyclists
://www.cyclestreets.net/blog/2011/02/20/council-cycling-contacts-crowdsourcing/
Martin, ** CycleStreets - For Cyclists, By Cyclists
Developer, CycleStreets ** http://www.cyclestreets.net/
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB
was *very* close, so every vote counts!
Martin, ** CycleStreets - For Cyclists, By Cyclists
Developer, CycleStreets ** http://www.cyclestreets.net/___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org
who make CycleStreets
possible, and also to Shaun and Andy especially for their support and
advice.
We are building a team to work on the iPhone app on an ongoing basis. If
you'd be interested to help with the coding for this, do drop us a line.
Martin, ** CycleStreets
there seems to be a layout glitch on their
website, but just ignore that - it does cast the vote correctly when you
carefully click the button).
Martin, ** CycleStreets - For Cyclists, By Cyclists
Developer, CycleStreets ** http://www.cyclestreets.net
Dave F. wrote:
How old is the database
It was a snapshot from their database about 4-6 weeks ago, so should be
pretty fresh, though it does contain errors (as would be expected given the
way bikeshops come and go).
are all bike shops members of this association?
Good point - I've no
This research funding opportunity notification below strikes me as
potentially very applicable to OpenStreetMap, if anyone has ideas for
something that would fit the requirements.
-- Forwarded message --
Subject: TSB/BBSRC: Harnessing Large and Diverse Sources of Data
Someone helpful at MySociety has published a mirror of the open data:
http://parlvid.mysociety.org:81/os/
Martin, ** CycleStreets - For Cyclists, By Cyclists
Developer, CycleStreets ** http://www.cyclestreets.net
On Thu, 1 Apr 2010, Martin - CycleStreets wrote:
Someone helpful at MySociety has published a mirror of the open data:
http://parlvid.mysociety.org:81/os/
and it's now also at:
http://data.gov.uk/data/publicbody/Ordnance%20Survey
___
Talk-GB
.
But for now - what would you do with those datasets?
---
Martin, ** CycleStreets - For Cyclists, By Cyclists
Developer, CycleStreets ** http://www.cyclestreets.net/
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http
Just to flag up that we have a Developer Day coming up for CycleStreets, to
be held in Cambridge on 6th March, for people who might be interested in
helping out with coding for the project.
Details at:
http://www.cyclestreets.net/blog/2010/02/17/developer-day-6th-march/
Martin
authority areas as such. But I thought I'd
throw in this real-world example to help inform debate..
Martin, ** CycleStreets - For Cyclists, By Cyclists
Developer, CycleStreets ** http://www.cyclestreets.net/
___
Talk-GB mailing
planner from the DfT / Cycling England.
.. Funding from other sources is being investigated though!
PS As this is my first posting to the list, thanks to all the mappers, who
enable CycleStreets to exist!
Martin, ** CycleStreets - For Cyclists, By Cyclists
Developer
38 matches
Mail list logo
