On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 4:01 PM, Iván Sánchez Ortega
[EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
Temporary files (or information arranged in memory) in your computer are
considered databases, so I'd go with option 1.
To be protectec under the database directive, you need to make a
significant investment for the
Hi,
Iván Sánchez Ortega wrote:
A *database* is a bunch of stuff in my computer's RAM. *Any* stuff at all.
It need not even be in your computer's RAM. And not everything in your
computer's RAM is a database (it needs to have been arranged
systematically or methodically).
Database
Hi,
Iván Sánchez Ortega wrote:
El Miércoles, 10 de Diciembre de 2008, Frederik Ramm escribió:
1. Each mapper has his own database, of which he makes a copy available
to OSM under ODbL which then creates a derived database. In that case,
of course, each mapper is a licensor, and OSM is a giant
El Jueves, 11 de Diciembre de 2008, Frederik Ramm escribió:
Temporary files (or information arranged in memory) in your computer are
considered databases, so I'd go with option 1.
Even for someone who edits using Potlatch?
IMHO, yes.
Heck, I'd even hold that a data array of any kind held
Hi,
Iván Sánchez Ortega wrote:
El Jueves, 11 de Diciembre de 2008, Frederik Ramm escribió:
Temporary files (or information arranged in memory) in your computer are
considered databases, so I'd go with option 1.
Even for someone who edits using Potlatch?
IMHO, yes.
Heck, I'd even hold
Hi,
there is another open question concerning the implementation of the
planned ODbL. To recap, the ODbL/FDL Duo will acknowledge that the
individual data items are not subject to copyright, but as a database
they are protected.
The question is: Where is the database created and who is,
Although option 3 as discussed above is likely the most legally fuzzy,
it is also likely the most palatable to contributors.
Landon
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 1:41 PM, Frederik Ramm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
there is another open question concerning the implementation of the
planned ODbL.
7 matches
Mail list logo
