Re: [OSM-talk] [Rebuild] Progress update

2012-06-21 Thread Richard Fairhurst
[followups set to legal-talk, but you may want to adjust to talk-us if focusing on LA etc.] On 21/06/2012 17:57, Alan Mintz wrote: Richard wrote: ...Given people's constraints on time and the community's (understandable) desire for the redaction to get underway asap... I've seen no such demo

Re: [OSM-talk] [Rebuild] Progress update

2012-06-21 Thread Jørgen Elgaard Larsen
Alan Mintz wrote: > I've seen no such demonstration of desire. The only thing we real > mappers are discussing is anxiety over exactly what will happen and > when, and the huge amount of data that is tainted and will be lost when > this thing is shoved down our throats. For what it's worth, I am a

Re: [OSM-talk] [Rebuild] Progress update

2012-06-21 Thread Alan Mintz
Richard wrote: >...Given people's constraints on time and the community's (understandable) >desire for the redaction to get underway asap... I've seen no such demonstration of desire. The only thing we real mappers are discussing is anxiety over exactly what will happen and when, and the huge a