2011/2/17 SomeoneElse :
> On 17/02/2011 01:04, Robin Paulson wrote:
> The last time that someone did this, a lot of people complained (me
> included) here. If there's a descrepancy then that needs to be resolved.
> If you've got access to REALLY good aerial imagery you might be able to do
> it re
On 17/02/2011 01:04, Robin Paulson wrote:
On 17 February 2011 12:21, David Murn wrote:
Ive fixed quite a number of spots where keepright has picked up a river
and highway on the same layer (=0), generally without a junction node.
i wonder what would be the consequences of scripting this?
The
On 17 February 2011 12:21, David Murn wrote:
> Ive fixed quite a number of spots where keepright has picked up a river
> and highway on the same layer (=0), generally without a junction node.
i wonder what would be the consequences of scripting this?
if layer does not exist and bridge = yes
then
On Wed, 2011-02-16 at 19:57 +1100, Elizabeth Dodd wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Feb 2011 20:56:54 -0500
> Nathan Edgars II wrote:
>
> > Since giving long ground-level ways nonzero layers screws up every
> > place they cross another way, it seems clear what should be done.
>
> -1 is used for rivers commonl
4 matches
Mail list logo
