Re: [OSM-talk] [Talk-us] TIGER Map Updates

2007-12-31 Thread Alex S.
Paul Fox wrote: dave wrote: Yeah, that's the trouble with the TIGER data. Its coverage is excellent, but the quality can be worse than what's there. So, do you wow. i'm beginning to realize that we in new england must be very lucky. sure, tiger shows a lot of non-existent roads, but

Re: [OSM-talk] [Talk-us] TIGER Map Updates

2007-12-31 Thread Dave Hansen
On Mon, 2007-12-31 at 04:01 -0800, Alex S. wrote: John Wolter wrote: TIGER depicts motorways as a single way It depicts almost all dual-carriageway roads as a single way. And sometimes it doesn't even say when it does. These are widespread enough that I do think we probably need to teach

Re: [OSM-talk] [Talk-us] TIGER Map Updates

2007-12-31 Thread Dave Hansen
On Mon, 2007-12-31 at 00:30 -0500, Paul Fox wrote: dave wrote: Yeah, that's the trouble with the TIGER data. Its coverage is excellent, but the quality can be worse than what's there. So, do you wow. i'm beginning to realize that we in new england must be very lucky. sure, tiger