Dave the positional accuracy of the 'new' TIGER stuff I hear is
substantially better across the board. Some suggestions: Build a list
of counties which have not had substantial edits to see if they can be
dropped for the new stuff? Import all the TIGER 2007 addressing stuff
in the Frederik
Anyway, it seems that the new data is substantially better than the old
in some places. What I'd like to do is twofold:
1. regenerate .osm files for all the new TIGER data
2. Compare new .osm files to old TIGER data plus stuff edited in OSM
Then, decide how if/when it is appropriate to
On Sun, Oct 19, 2008 at 10:54 AM, Dave Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Has anyone looked at importing the TIGER 2007 data yet? I was going to
start coding up the conversion utilities to get started. It appears
that this shapefile format may have existing OSM converters out there.
Anyone
On Sun, 2008-10-19 at 11:10 -0700, Karl Newman wrote:
On Sun, Oct 19, 2008 at 10:54 AM, Dave Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Has anyone looked at importing the TIGER 2007 data yet? I was
going to
start coding up the conversion utilities to get started. It
On Sun, Oct 19, 2008 at 11:14 AM, Dave Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 2008-10-19 at 11:10 -0700, Karl Newman wrote:
On Sun, Oct 19, 2008 at 10:54 AM, Dave Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Has anyone looked at importing the TIGER 2007 data yet? I was
going to
On Sun, 2008-10-19 at 11:25 -0700, Karl Newman wrote:
Ah. Quite a trick... I seem to recall that somebody had wanted to do
that earlier, but I think they got discouraged by the difficulty.
Well, time may have made me forget what a pain the original import was.
We'll see how far I get this time.
On Sun, 2008-10-19 at 14:29 -0400, Russ Nelson wrote:
Dave Hansen writes:
Then, decide how if/when it is appropriate to write over the old TIGER
stuff with new. Or, to merge it somehow.
I've updated it in some cases. Perhaps only update if the data is
unchecked?
Sure, that would be
7 matches
Mail list logo
