I adjusted my criteria for islands, villages, towns and cities.
There are now 102,691 matches and 230 mismatches.
http://edwardbetts.com/osm-wikidata/
http://edwardbetts.com/osm-wikidata/mismatches.html
--
Edward.
___
talk mailing list
Edward Betts edward at 4angle.com writes:
I adjusted my criteria for islands, villages, towns and cities.
There are now 102,691 matches and 230 mismatches.
http://edwardbetts.com/osm-wikidata/
http://edwardbetts.com/osm-wikidata/mismatches.html
How old are the datasets you are
On 06/09/2014 09:15, Edward Betts wrote:
I adjusted my criteria for islands, villages, towns and cities.
There are now 102,691 matches and 230 mismatches.
http://edwardbetts.com/osm-wikidata/
http://edwardbetts.com/osm-wikidata/mismatches.html
One question that immediately springs to mind -
Dear Edward,
first: great! And I really support the idea of importing wikidata tags.
One thing I still don't get is why you are relying on wikipedia
categories instead of on the instance of property in wikidata. In my
view the correct way would be to use these and if they are not present
at the
Morray os...@go4more.de wrote:
One thing I still don't get is why you are relying on wikipedia
categories instead of on the instance of property in wikidata. In my
view the correct way would be to use these and if they are not present
at the moment make them become present. Since you already
https://wdq.wmflabs.org/ is a powerful Tool for Wikidata
I used the Wikipedia categories because the Wikidata 'instance of' property
is
often missing. I'm struggling to figure out how to use the Wikidata API to
search for items by 'instance of' property. You're right I should add
'instance
On 06/09/2014 22:15, Archer wrote:
https://wdq.wmflabs.org/ is a powerful Tool for Wikidata
Thanks, but the query builder doesn't appear to actually work, though
(in either Chrome or SeaMonkey on Windows) without cutting and pasting
the resulting magic codeinto a separate search form, and
I modified my code, adding more categories and extending the matching distance
for some objects. I started checking addr:housename, some buildings have this
tag but are missing the name tag.
http://edwardbetts.com/osm-wikidata/
There are now 112,278 matches found. I thought the extended range
Am 05.09.2014 11:06, schrieb Edward Betts:
.
I've got some ideas about how to fix some of the mismatches. Many of the
mismatches are villages represented by both a node and a relation, but the
relation isn't tagged with place=village, so my code can't tell it represents
the same thing.
There is a difference between municipality and settlements like villages.
Wikipedia articles are often about the whole municipality and not about a
single village. So the wikidata-tag should only be tagged onto the
administrative relation for the municipality
Please do not add any Wikidata-Tags
Archer arc...@gulli.com wrote:
There is a difference between municipality and settlements like villages.
Wikipedia articles are often about the whole municipality and not about a
single village. So the wikidata-tag should only be tagged onto the
administrative relation for the municipality
2014-09-05 11:31 GMT+02:00 Simon Poole si...@poole.ch:
Example: Sachsendorf, Germany
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/240130457
http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2253462
This is rather off-topic in the sense that it has nearly nothing to do
with wikidata, but in general using
Edward Betts edward at 4angle.com writes:
Don't be alarmed, this is a work in progress. I'm not going to add any
wikidata tags until we have reached a consensus.
Is there an advantage deriving wikidata tags from existing wikipedia tags?
--
Andrew
On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 11:06 AM, Edward Betts edw...@4angle.com wrote:
I started checking addr:housename, some buildings have this
tag but are missing the name tag.
addr:housename is most of the time improperly used in OSM (should be
in the name tag). I understand it is increasing your matching
Pieren pier...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 11:06 AM, Edward Betts edw...@4angle.com wrote:
I started checking addr:housename, some buildings have this
tag but are missing the name tag.
addr:housename is most of the time improperly used in OSM (should be
in the name tag). I
:Stonehenge: https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q39671
https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q587584 both WD objects match the same OSM
object: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/37118074
Berlin Wall: http://wikidata.org/wiki/Q5086 matches only one way of the
wall but the Wiki article says there are three parts
16 matches
Mail list logo
