Re: [OSM-talk] Bridge on Hiking Trails

2009-11-26 Thread Mike Harris
layering. Mike Harris -Original Message- From: Dave F. [mailto:dave...@madasafish.com] Sent: 25 November 2009 21:58 Cc: OSM Talk Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Bridge on Hiking Trails Shaun McDonald wrote: on the way use highway=footway; bridge=yes; layer=1. I didn't think the layer=1

[OSM-talk] Bridge on Hiking Trails

2009-11-25 Thread Shalabh
Was mapping a few hiking trails with foot-only bridges on the trail and could not figure out a way to mark these bridge since the only bridge waypoint needs the same parameters as a highway. Any pointers on how to do this best? Regards, Shalabh ___

Re: [OSM-talk] Bridge on Hiking Trails

2009-11-25 Thread Shaun McDonald
On 25 Nov 2009, at 11:45, Shalabh wrote: Was mapping a few hiking trails with foot-only bridges on the trail and could not figure out a way to mark these bridge since the only bridge waypoint needs the same parameters as a highway. Any pointers on how to do this best? on the way use

Re: [OSM-talk] Bridge on Hiking Trails

2009-11-25 Thread Russ Nelson
Shalabh writes: Was mapping a few hiking trails with foot-only bridges on the trail and could not figure out a way to mark these bridge since the only bridge waypoint needs the same parameters as a highway. Any pointers on how to do this best? Sure. Any bridgey thing can be tagged

Re: [OSM-talk] Bridge on Hiking Trails

2009-11-25 Thread Shalabh
Dont think my question was specific enough. I am using JOSM for this and using highway tag means giving speed limits. I am using the path=hiking trail for the trail and would ideally need a bridge attribute 'yes' within the hiking trail. Regards, Shalabh On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 7:38 PM, Russ

Re: [OSM-talk] Bridge on Hiking Trails

2009-11-25 Thread Shalabh
JOSM does not give me that option of a bridge under hiking trail, atleast not while using the presets. If I use the highway tag with a bridge, consider this. I have a hiking trail marked as an 'demanding alpine hiking' 50 km from any humanity and then I have a bridge tagged as highway in the

Re: [OSM-talk] Bridge on Hiking Trails

2009-11-25 Thread Jean-Marc Liotier
Shalabh wrote: using highway tag means giving speed limits. You don't have to - it is optional. I am using the path=hiking trail for the trail and would ideally need a bridge attribute 'yes' within the hiking trail. Add the bridge=yes tag - it works just fine for that.

Re: [OSM-talk] Bridge on Hiking Trails

2009-11-25 Thread Jonathan Bennett
Shalabh wrote: JOSM does not give me that option of a bridge under hiking trail, atleast not while using the presets. If I use the highway tag with a bridge, consider this. I have a hiking trail marked as an 'demanding alpine hiking' 50 km from any humanity and then I have a bridge tagged as

Re: [OSM-talk] Bridge on Hiking Trails

2009-11-25 Thread Jukka Rahkonen
Shalabh shalabh.w at gmail.com writes: JOSM does not give me that option of a bridge under hiking trail, atleast not while using the presets. Forget the presets, you can tag how ever you want in OSM. Split your trail from both ends of the bridge, select that part and add tag bridge=yes with

Re: [OSM-talk] Bridge on Hiking Trails

2009-11-25 Thread Craig Wallace
On 25/11/2009 14:45, Shalabh wrote: JOSM does not give me that option of a bridge under hiking trail, atleast not while using the presets. If I use the highway tag with a bridge, consider this. I have a hiking trail marked as an 'demanding alpine hiking' 50 km from any humanity and then I

Re: [OSM-talk] Bridge on Hiking Trails

2009-11-25 Thread Russ Nelson
You don't have to fill in *anything* in a preset. If you don't, then all of the optional stuff is left out and you only get the bridge=yes tag, which is useful if you've forgotten. Otherwise, you can just add it as an attribute. The typing completion makes it very easy. Click on Add, type b

Re: [OSM-talk] Bridge on Hiking Trails

2009-11-25 Thread Dave F.
Shaun McDonald wrote: on the way use highway=footway; bridge=yes; layer=1. I didn't think the layer=1 was necessary when there's only one bridge - it defaults to display above other objects. I only use in there a multiple bridges crossing each other. Dave F.

Re: [OSM-talk] Bridge on Hiking Trails

2009-11-25 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
2009/11/25 Dave F. dave...@madasafish.com Shaun McDonald wrote: on the way use highway=footway; bridge=yes; layer=1. I didn't think the layer=1 was necessary when there's only one bridge - it defaults to display above other objects. I only use in there a multiple bridges crossing each

Re: [OSM-talk] Bridge on Hiking Trails

2009-11-25 Thread Michael Kugelmann
Dave F. schrieb: on the way use highway=footway; bridge=yes; layer=1. I didn't think the layer=1 was necessary when there's only one bridge - it defaults to display above other objects. I only use in there a multiple bridges crossing each other. I don't trust any more on defaults:

Re: [OSM-talk] Bridge on Hiking Trails

2009-11-25 Thread Scott Atwood
I think I may understand your confusion here. You may think of highway to mean a high-speed paved road on which motor vehicles travel. But within the context of OSM, the highway tag is much more general purpose. Virtually all formal and informal roads and paths should be tagged highway,

Re: [OSM-talk] Bridge on Hiking Trails

2009-11-25 Thread andrzej zaborowski
2009/11/25 Dave F. dave...@madasafish.com: Shaun McDonald wrote: on the way use highway=footway; bridge=yes; layer=1. I didn't think the layer=1 was necessary when there's only one bridge - it defaults to display above other objects. I only use in there a multiple bridges crossing each

Re: [OSM-talk] Bridge on Hiking Trails

2009-11-25 Thread John Smith
2009/11/26 andrzej zaborowski balr...@gmail.com: I assume layer is 0 if I don't add the layer tag. Yes, which is usually anything at ground level. Hopefully this is the correct thing to assume because otherwise things will break if I have a bridge with no layer tag and a another bridge No