On 23/12/2010 12:10, Laurence Penney wrote:
I've been 'exploding' several building nodes into ways,
City centres maps look so much better with polygon ways, don't they?
To encourage this practice it would be useful if the R (replicate) key
in Potlatch worked from nodes to ways. It could also
On 29 December 2010 13:47, Dave F. dave...@madasafish.com wrote:
On 23/12/2010 12:10, Laurence Penney wrote:
I've been 'exploding' several building nodes into ways,
City centres maps look so much better with polygon ways, don't they?
To encourage this practice it would be useful if the R
On 29/12/2010 20:17, andrzej zaborowski wrote:
Hi Dave,
On 29 December 2010 21:04, Dave F.dave...@madasafish.com wrote:
On 29/12/2010 17:30, andrzej zaborowski wrote:
On 29 December 2010 13:47, Dave F.dave...@madasafish.comwrote:
On 23/12/2010 12:10, Laurence Penney wrote:
I've been
On 29/12/2010 21:13, Dave F. wrote:
On 29/12/2010 20:17, andrzej zaborowski wrote:
Hi Dave,
On 29 December 2010 21:04, Dave F.dave...@madasafish.com wrote:
On 29/12/2010 17:30, andrzej zaborowski wrote:
On 29 December 2010 13:47, Dave F.dave...@madasafish.comwrote:
On 23/12/2010 12:10,
On 29 December 2010 22:13, Dave F. dave...@madasafish.com wrote:
On 29/12/2010 20:17, andrzej zaborowski wrote:
Hi Dave,
On 29 December 2010 21:04, Dave F.dave...@madasafish.com wrote:
On 29/12/2010 17:30, andrzej zaborowski wrote:
On 29 December 2010 13:47, Dave F.dave...@madasafish.com
On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 4:44 PM, andrzej zaborowski balr...@gmail.com wrote:
Well, this still needs a change in the database schema and the API
because currently there's no such attribute that the editors could
use.
If you're going to change the database schema, I vote for just making
IDs
On 29 December 2010 23:12, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 4:44 PM, andrzej zaborowski balr...@gmail.com wrote:
Well, this still needs a change in the database schema and the API
because currently there's no such attribute that the editors could
use.
If you're going to
Thanks for the comments, everybody. The reuse of the old node in the new way,
though not of supreme elegance, seems a very nice hack and I'll use it from now
on.
- L
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
I've been 'exploding' several building nodes into ways, based on splendid Bing
imagery for Bristol. I'm getting concerned about data loss, the fact that any
external database accumulating information on such vulnerable nodes, e.g. [1],
will only with difficulty and guesswork be able to match it
I was advised on the newbies list a while ago to make that initial
node part of the new way. ie. you move the node to somewhere on the
edge of the building, then start tracing from that node. This means
the node isn't deleted and one can see where in the history this node
was converted from a lone
Andrew Harvey andrew.harvey4 at gmail.com writes:
I was advised on the newbies list a while ago to make that initial
node part of the new way. ie. you move the node to somewhere on the
edge of the building, then start tracing from that node. This means
the node isn't deleted and one can see where
On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 11:10 PM, Laurence Penney l...@lorp.org wrote:
* Is there a tagging convention to record node-way conversion, i.e. what was
this way's predecessor_node?
I think it would be worthwhile to use relations here, to also address
the general issue of different representations
At 2010-12-23 04:10, Laurence Penney wrote:
I've been 'exploding' several building nodes into ways, based on splendid
Bing imagery for Bristol.
It is nice, isn't it? I've been lucky enough to have 25/30cm imagery from
USGS in most of my area, but this 6cm stuff is awesome. And cheers to the
13 matches
Mail list logo
