> At 01:04 AM 21/05/2008, Andy Allan wrote:
>
> For things specific to cyclists, I use description:bicycle=
>
As the Cycle maps use relations to tie the various way together into a
route, I believe that any route specific information should be contained
in the relation rather than in the underlyin
The issue would be arranging rendering for it, not merely suggesting
tag names...
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 7:51 AM, Mike Collinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> For broad descriptive use there is already the description= tag, designed for
> future pop-up maps and for search-oriented functions such
At 01:04 AM 21/05/2008, Andy Allan wrote:
>On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 8:16 PM, OJ W <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Is it possible to add descriptions that would be visible on the
>> detailed zoom of the cycle map?
>>
>> e.g. "and now there are no NCN signs until Salford", or "ignore
>> misleading sign
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 8:16 PM, OJ W <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is it possible to add descriptions that would be visible on the
> detailed zoom of the cycle map?
>
> e.g. "and now there are no NCN signs until Salford", or "ignore
> misleading sign here" - that sort of thing to help people planni
> Is it possible to add descriptions that would be visible on the
> detailed zoom of the cycle map?
>
> e.g. "and now there are no NCN signs until Salford", or "ignore
> misleading sign here" - that sort of thing to help people planning a
> route...
>
I don't whether this is appropriate, but I sug
Is it possible to add descriptions that would be visible on the
detailed zoom of the cycle map?
e.g. "and now there are no NCN signs until Salford", or "ignore
misleading sign here" - that sort of thing to help people planning a
route...
___
talk mailin
6 matches
Mail list logo
