Adam,
Very often newbie to OSM start their contribution with moving object according
misaligned imagery.They just don't know imagery can be offset. It's can be
detected automatically. Plus overleaping or unconnected ways, ways without
tags, intersections without shared nodes.
It will be grate
-Original Message-
From: Dmitry Terentiev [mailto:djterent...@yandex.ru]
Sent: Sunday, April 08, 2012 12:16 PM
To: talk@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Detecting unwanted edits and vandalism
Adam,
Very often newbie to OSM start their contribution with moving object
Its the edits that mess up the existing data and make it difficult to undo
that are most undesirable:
1) If the user is new, these would usually be in the first few changesets:
a) untagged ways not connected to anything
b) ways that are shifted
c) single node shifted way out of place
d) untagged
Am 7. April 2012 18:00 schrieb Arun Ganesh arun.plane...@gmail.com:
g) ALL CAPS in name tags
I've also met a very experienced user who insisted on Caps in
NAME-tags. Unfortunately. He cited the on the ground rule for this.
Afaik he is not active any more though, since the license change
Dear mappers,
I'm looking into ways to detect harmful map edits in an automated way.
I'm fairly new to OSM and I'd like to hear about what typical mistakes have
you seen while editing and what kind of changes would you consider to be
vandalism.
Any insight would be much appreciated.
Best
I think most humanly possible way is to set up monitoring for concrete
region and follow changesets. Usually those with vandalism don't have
very insightful changeset comments, also user names can sometimes
indicate intent.
I think there is no way computer can detect this except using our
defined
On 6 apr 2012, at 21:26, Adam Velkei wrote:
Dear mappers,
I'm looking into ways to detect harmful map edits in an automated way.
I'm fairly new to OSM and I'd like to hear about what typical mistakes have
you seen while editing and what kind of changes would you consider to be
7 matches
Mail list logo
