The problem?
Large areas of blank map that, when viewed zoomed out, look to be tree
covered areas.
Result:
Initial mappers tag the large areas as tree covered, ignoring details
such as lakes, tree cuttings etc.
Some time later details of lakes, tree cuts are added. this may be some
years
Hi Mateusz
The link below shows north of Canada areas, where the wood landcover correspond
in general to Canvec imports. The blank areas are mostly not mapped yet except
some lakes and
infrastructures.https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=5/55.740/-79.804
But for Labrador, the contributors have
While I second Mateusz, the obvious solution for data users who may want to get
rid of them in OSM is to filter them out.
Yves ___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Feb 12, 2020, 01:54 by pierz...@yahoo.fr:
> > > > pierz...@yahoo.fr
> > > If we could keep the wood landcover outside of OSM, it would greatly
> > > simplify mapping of such areas and dramatically reduce the Mulipolygons
> > > problems where huge multipolygons are created with inner for lakes
4 matches
Mail list logo
