Re: [OSM-talk] Fw: Software goes on, brain goes off...

2010-06-03 Thread Steve Chilton
: [OSM-talk] Fw: Software goes on, brain goes off... On 3 June 2010 00:15, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote: They could always require people to log in. Or require people to log in if they want to put up with the annoying terms and conditions only once

[OSM-talk] Fw: Software goes on, brain goes off...

2010-06-02 Thread Nick Whitelegg
Sorry, this was intended for the *list*, not Anthony. Damn mail client... She wasn't playing, she was walking to her destination. I can't tell from the pictures whether it was her fault for following the route, her fault for walking on the wrong side of the road, her fault for not staying

Re: [OSM-talk] Fw: Software goes on, brain goes off...

2010-06-02 Thread Anthony
On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 9:49 AM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.comwrote: Worst than that, it could lead to even more stupid terms and conditions annoying you over and over and over again after every route request. They could always require people to log in. Or require people to log in if

Re: [OSM-talk] Fw: Software goes on, brain goes off...

2010-06-02 Thread John Smith
On 3 June 2010 00:15, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote: They could always require people to log in. Or require people to log in if they want to put up with the annoying terms and conditions only once. This woman is claiming she wasn't warned the route might be bad, so to ensure that people don't

Re: [OSM-talk] Fw: Software goes on, brain goes off...

2010-06-02 Thread Anthony
On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 10:16 AM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.comwrote: On 3 June 2010 00:15, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote: They could always require people to log in. Or require people to log in if they want to put up with the annoying terms and conditions only once. This woman is

Re: [OSM-talk] Fw: Software goes on, brain goes off...

2010-06-02 Thread John Smith
On 3 June 2010 00:24, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote: This woman is claiming she wasn't warned the route might be bad, so to ensure that people don't forget they agreed to view the warning only once, everyone will be forced to view it every time regardless. Really? Do you have a link for that?