Am 14.07.2013 17:08, schrieb Serge Wroclawski:
On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 10:10 AM, Andreas Reimer
andreas.rei...@geog.uni-heidelberg.de wrote:
It sounds like you understand these arguments (at least partially), so
let's not go over the same points needlessly, but at the same time I
think it
Christoph,
I do see your point regarding lacking information in papers.
Truth to be told, most labelling research is from computational geometry
and they do often not care too much about actually labelling the maps,
weird as it sounds. And as a more math-based discipline, they have a
very
Serge, I greatly appreciate your input from other disciplines.
As to the cultural differences between fields, I was never implying the
structure of either is better than the other.
As much as I can see why providing the full implementation is the true
proof of the pudding for some fields, in
Hi there, I am a colleage of Max's and we collaborated on his labelling
papers. Chiming in to straighten up some potential miscommunications.
Am 13.07.2013 20:36, schrieb Christoph Hormann:
But i would actually emphasize a more practical point: Since this is
meant to be scientific research
On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 10:10 AM, Andreas Reimer
andreas.rei...@geog.uni-heidelberg.de wrote:
Hi there, I am a colleage of Max's and we collaborated on his labelling
papers. Chiming in to straighten up some potential miscommunications.
I think there's general understanding but some substantial
On Sunday 14 July 2013, Andreas Reimer wrote:
The whole point of algorithms research is to move beyond
implementation and do research, well on algorithms, instead of
software libraries. That Max has a very stable and functional
framework is uncommon for the scientific community.
And he built
Hi
Am 12.07.2013 20:30, schrieb Maxim Rylov:
Is the algorithm available as open source?
Unfortunately, the algorithm currently is not open-source, but the model
that we elaborated and used will be published as a journal paper within
the next few months.
That's really a pitty. How can someone
That's really a pitty. How can someone profit from your work (aka
Shoulders of Giants)? What worth is it pointing to us, how bad our
label placement is and how good it could be by not giving us the tools
to fix it?
I did not want to abuse anybody. At frist I tried to present the results
that
On Friday 12 July 2013, Maxim Rylov wrote:
As far as I know Mapnik and other open-source software take into
account only the rules R1, R2 and R5 (partially, returns labels that
are evenly spread out, example - http://maps.skobbler.com/on z11).
And the greedy algorithm that is utilized to
7/12/2013 12:18 AM, Christoph Hormann wrote:
Could you explain in what ways this is the case. Since different types
of labels are shown in various maps direct comparison is difficult.
You seem to very well avoid overlaps between labels and none the less
you are able to put quite a lot of them
Hi all,
We are pleased to announce that a new web map based on OSM data has just
been published. You can see it on http://openmapsurfer.uni-hd.de/ (OSM
Roads (New) layer).
One thing that greatly distinguishes it from other online maps is the
quality of map lettering.
We, the researchers the
On Thursday 11 July 2013, Maxim Rylov wrote:
Hi all,
We are pleased to announce that a new web map based on OSM data has
just been published. You can see it on
http://openmapsurfer.uni-hd.de/ (OSM Roads (New) layer).
One thing that greatly distinguishes it from other online maps is the
12 matches
Mail list logo
