Re: [OSM-talk] How can we make this list better?

On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 2:02 AM, john whelan wrote: > Perhaps recognise that OSM is changing and developing in ways it's creators > never intended? i think this and previous threads on this list show that this is being recognised. we're now looking at the next step, which is the question in the t

Re: [OSM-talk] How can we make this list better?

Hi, john whelan wrote: Perhaps recognise that OSM is changing and developing in ways it's creators never intended? I'm currently looking at a project that uses data that is not cc-by-ca by any means however it can be imported into an OSM file format and use the OSM tool set to basically crea

Re: [OSM-talk] How can we make this list better?

Perhaps recognise that OSM is changing and developing in ways it's creators never intended? I'm currently looking at a project that uses data that is not cc-by-ca by any means however it can be imported into an OSM file format and use the OSM tool set to basically create a stand alone DVD that is

[OSM-talk] How can we make this list better?

this list has come in for some criticism recently, and there are many people who have, publicly or otherwise, decided not to read it or contribute to it any more. i've set up a wiki page to help us gather suggestions and ideas for improving this list, or maybe even trying something new in its place