Re: [OSM-talk] How does one tag a business that closed and was replaced by something else?

On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 11:18 AM, Andrew Wiseman wrote: > Hi, > > In this case, two businesses closed and were replaced by a single business > that took over both buildings (they are adjoining.) How should I tag this? > I didn't see anything about closed: or former: on the

[OSM-talk] How does one tag a business that closed and was replaced by something else?

Hi, In this case, two businesses closed and were replaced by a single business that took over both buildings (they are adjoining.) How should I tag this? I didn't see anything about closed: or former: on the wiki. Thanks, Andrew -- 600,000 DC residents don't have a vote in Congress --

Re: [OSM-talk] How does one tag a business that closed and was replaced by something else?

On 14/12/15 17:18, Andrew Wiseman wrote: > In this case, two businesses closed and were replaced by a single > business that took over both buildings (they are adjoining.) How should > I tag this? I didn't see anything about closed: or former: on the wiki. If the units are individually identified

Re: [OSM-talk] How does one tag a business that closed and was replaced by something else?

I usually just either replace the tags of the node with the info for the new business (example: http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1400581558/history) , or in your case, the tags of the buildings. Perhaps merge the buildings also if they are functionally one structure? On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at

Re: [OSM-talk] How does one tag a business that closed and was replaced by something else?

On Mon, 14 Dec 2015 12:18:41 -0500 Andrew Wiseman wrote: > Hi, > > In this case, two businesses closed and were replaced by a single > business that took over both buildings (they are adjoining.) How > should I tag this? I didn't see anything about closed: or former: on >