Re: [OSM-talk] IME no proposals needed | Re: Creation of "Data Items" by bot for undocumented tags

2020-02-19 Thread Joseph Eisenberg
> I have occasionally moved such pages into the user's name space when I found them to (by content, if not by name) to be proposals for something, rather than a documentation of something already established. That is fine if the tag has not been used, and the page is written like a proposal

Re: [OSM-talk] IME no proposals needed | Re: Creation of "Data Items" by bot for undocumented tags

2020-02-19 Thread Frederik Ramm
Hi, On 19.02.20 07:33, Rory McCann wrote: > I don't know what your experience with the OSM wiki is, but I've created > new wiki pages for new tags, without bothering with proposal pages. I have occasionally moved such pages into the user's name space when I found them to (by content, if not by

Re: [OSM-talk] IME no proposals needed | Re: Creation of "Data Items" by bot for undocumented tags

2020-02-18 Thread Mateusz Konieczny via talk
19 Feb 2020, 08:27 by 61sundow...@gmail.com: > There are those who; > think the proposal process it the only way to create wiki pages. > there are those who degenerate wiki pages with few uses, to the extent > of editing those wiki pages to discourage use.  > Proposal pages are

Re: [OSM-talk] IME no proposals needed | Re: Creation of "Data Items" by bot for undocumented tags

2020-02-18 Thread Warin
There are those who; think the proposal process it the only way to create wiki pages. there are those who degenerate wiki pages with few uses, to the extent of editing those wiki pages to discourage use. 'Any tags you like' is one mantra ... but documenting them in the wiki and leaving them

[OSM-talk] IME no proposals needed | Re: Creation of "Data Items" by bot for undocumented tags

2020-02-18 Thread Rory McCann
I don't know what your experience with the OSM wiki is, but I've created new wiki pages for new tags, without bothering with proposal pages. When has anyone told you that you need to do that? Did someone write that down somewhere? Maybe that should be corrected. Do you have links to where you