Re: [OSM-talk] Idea for improving mapping system

2020-10-18 Thread Dave F via talk
All the OSM 'leaderboard' sites I've seen are based on quantity. OSM needs more quality mappers. There's a page which tabled the number of changesets created by individual contributors per day/week/month. I believe this led to a few anal retentives quickly creating one changeset for every coupl

Re: [OSM-talk] Idea for improving mapping system

2020-10-18 Thread Yves via talk
Out of topic content. There is discussions about being more welcoming on this list, along with being open to other communications channels. Even with that in mind, I must admit I hadn't logged in or subscribed to slack to check on the discussion while the topic may be of interest. By any means,

Re: [OSM-talk] Idea for improving mapping system

2020-10-17 Thread Maarten Deen
+1 I'm sorry if I sound a little paranoid, but somone with an email address of little.banana.peel and calling him TheAdventurer64 and asking people to read something for which they have to log in to with a google account does not give the feel for a solid foundation for a discussion. Regards

Re: [OSM-talk] Idea for improving mapping system

2020-10-17 Thread Joseph Eisenberg
Would you mind describing the proposed system here, in a concise form? On Sat, Oct 17, 2020 at 7:36 PM TheAdventurer64 < little.banana.p...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello everyone, > > A user and I were talking about implementing a system for better mapping, > as described here: > https://osmus.slack.

[OSM-talk] Idea for improving mapping system

2020-10-17 Thread TheAdventurer64
Hello everyone, A user and I were talking about implementing a system for better mapping, as described here: https://osmus.slack.com/archives/C029HV951/p1602968516431900 This addition would have many benefits, including: * More mapping. We have tons of new mappers each day, as well as a great edit