Hi,
...
>
> I guess numbers 3) and 4) are problematic. I know they do much more
> than the current feature set of OSMdoc but I implemented them because
> those were two fairly often requested features. I guess their priority
> just dropped a lot :)
>
> So I guess my current solution would be to off
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 15:43, Richard Weait wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 6:47 AM, Richard Fairhurst
> wrote:
>>
>> Lars Francke wrote:
>>> At the moment I'm displaying statistical data about a snapshot of
>>> the OSM data.
>>
>> Hooee, this is probably the single trickiest question I've seen.
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 6:47 AM, Richard Fairhurst wrote:
>
> Lars Francke wrote:
>> At the moment I'm displaying statistical data about a snapshot of
>> the OSM data.
>
> Hooee, this is probably the single trickiest question I've seen.
>
> I can't find any precedents for whether aggregate statisti
Lars Francke wrote:
> At the moment I'm displaying statistical data about a snapshot of
> the OSM data. If it'd stay that way it would be very easy for me to
> switch from one license to the other as the data wouldn't depend on
> data from the CC by-SA set. But I'm currently rewriting the tool to
I've just listened to the podcast, I've read a lot of the mails on the
mailing lists in the last few days, I've read quite a few discussions
about it on IRC, the proposal document, parts of the license, the
human readable form of the license and a lot of the Wiki pages.
The more I read the less I
5 matches
Mail list logo
