Re: [OSM-talk] Landuse vs Vegetation vs Landcover proposed cleanup at wiki

2014-12-01 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
2014-11-30 12:53 GMT+01:00 Richard Z. ricoz@gmail.com: The problem is not only that forest can be mapped as either landuse,landcover or natural. I'm also interested in this topic. I think it is not a problem to have different keys, because there are different aspects of the same object

Re: [OSM-talk] Landuse vs Vegetation vs Landcover proposed cleanup at wiki

2014-11-30 Thread Richard Z.
On Sun, Nov 30, 2014 at 11:04:28AM +0400, Никита wrote: We have highly inconsistent content at wiki (feature pages http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Category:Features). Inconsistency is not limited to landuse=wood/natural=forest. Another example is landuse=meadow (Landuse

Re: [OSM-talk] Landuse vs Vegetation vs Landcover proposed cleanup at wiki

2014-11-30 Thread Ed Loach
If I understand correctly we are talking about combining 3 similar wiki pages into 1, not changing any tagging, in which case it makes sense. In my opinion the wiki needs more how to tag instructions (e.g. links to videos showing how in basic mode in most popular editors) as well as the existing

[OSM-talk] Landuse vs Vegetation vs Landcover proposed cleanup at wiki

2014-11-29 Thread Никита
We have highly inconsistent content at wiki (feature pages http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Category:Features). Inconsistency is not limited to landuse=wood/natural=forest. Another example is landuse=meadow (Landuse http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Landuse, Vegetation