Hi
I've been looking at this thread with interest and it is probably at
risk of resurrecting the endless (?) debate about the use of foot-way,
path etc. tags. Without expressing any personal view, to avoid reopening
that debate, I would merely note that - rightly or wrongly - the
2010/3/12 Roy Wallace waldo000...@gmail.com:
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 12:55 PM, Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote:
.. I'm still unclear how one is supposed to
distinguish between a smooth, wide urban footpath and a hiking trail.
have a look at
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 10:55 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer
dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
.. I'm still unclear how one is supposed to
distinguish between a smooth, wide urban footpath and a hiking trail.
have a look at http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:sac_scale for
detailed classification.
2010/3/15 Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com:
So Roy suggests smoothness and you suggest sac_scale. Neither is
really definitive.
I don't get you here. What do you mean by really definitive? By
August 2009 we had 36770 occurencies of sac_scale in our database [1]
Probably in the meantime it
.. I'm still unclear how one is supposed to
distinguish between a smooth, wide urban footpath and a hiking trail.
A footpath can be traversed by a weelchair, perambulator or shopping trolley?
Regards,
Nick
***
WARNING:
2010/3/16 nicholas.g.lawre...@tmr.qld.gov.au:
.. I'm still unclear how one is supposed to
distinguish between a smooth, wide urban footpath and a hiking trail.
A footpath can be traversed by a weelchair, perambulator or shopping
trolley?
I'd say to estimate this you should have a
So mtb:scale=5 would be a vertical cliff?
Have you seen the video that plays in the Blacks outdoor shops?? Yes would be
the answer! Incredible.
--
___
Surf the Web in a faster, safer and easier way:
Download Opera 9 at http://www.opera.com
(PS I used the S.O.S (Spawn of Satan) tag 'path' , so I'm not sure
how
many of my trails will work with other stylesheets)
path isn't Spawn of Satan! ;-)
What is Spawn of Satan, here in the UK at least, is foot=yes. ;-) This
is completely ambiguous, either use designated for a designated
2010/3/12 Mike N. nice...@att.net:
Exactly - I'm just at the point where I need a high quality hiking /
biking map in a relatively small region in the US.
Maybe http://hikebikemap.de works for you?
Cheers
Colin
___
talk mailing list
Exactly - I'm just at the point where I need a high quality hiking /
biking map in a relatively small region in the US.
Maybe http://hikebikemap.de works for you?
I like it as a start; the colors of the main roads are muted which is good.
And I like the map legend which is necessary for
On 12/03/2010 10:23, Nick Whitelegg wrote:
(PS I used the S.O.S (Spawn of Satan) tag 'path' , so I'm not sure
how
many of my trails will work with other stylesheets)
path isn't Spawn of Satan! ;-)
What is Spawn of Satan, here in the UK at least, is foot=yes. ;-) This
is completely
Mike N. wrote:
I'm very much in favour of improving both the quality of hiking data,
and its representation (particularly outside Europe). But do make an
effort to consolidate the existing material rather than just adding
another layer of paint over the top.
Exactly - I'm just at the
Le 11/03/2010 11:58, Nick Whitelegg a écrit :
Hello everyone,
Thanks for the responses on this. What I would like to do this year is
really try to bring together everyone on the list who is interested in
developing OSM software (both web and mobile) for walkers (hikers) so that
we can make a
Hello everyone,
Thanks for the responses on this. What I would like to do this year is
really try to bring together everyone on the list who is interested in
developing OSM software (both web and mobile) for walkers (hikers) so that
we can make a good go of exchanging ideas and developing
I'm very much in favour of improving both the quality of hiking data,
and its representation (particularly outside Europe). But do make an
effort to consolidate the existing material rather than just adding
another layer of paint over the top.
Exactly - I'm just at the point where I need a
(And similarly, how to distinguish between a bike path and a mountain
bike track).
I added mtb:scale to mountain bike tracks. But around here, even the
steepest, roughest terrain is only 1 or 2 out of a scale of 5. I think
mtb:scale=3 is something like leaping off 1 meter boulders g
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 12:55 PM, Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote:
.. I'm still unclear how one is supposed to
distinguish between a smooth, wide urban footpath and a hiking trail.
For smoothness, use surface=*
For width, use width=*
(And similarly, how to distinguish between a bike
To: talk@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] OSM for walkers / hikers - getting it going!
(And similarly, how to distinguish between a bike path and a mountain
bike track).
I added mtb:scale to mountain bike tracks. But around here, even the
steepest, roughest terrain is only 1 or 2 out
18 matches
Mail list logo
