Ian Haylock wrote:
> Surely if a person releases something under PD, he/she is giving up
> all rights to that information, be it software, data, etc.
> So what's to stop OSM doing what they want with the data.
>
> For instance if the whole of the OSM database was public domain. A
> private c
Hi,
Bruce Cowan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
What happens if a non-PD editor edits PD data? Does it become non-PD or does it
stay PD? What if the editor doesn't want their edits to be PD?
This is why we need one licence for everyone.
I'm happy for my GPXs to be PD, but not my edits.
Surely if a
On Mon, 2008-02-04 at 12:31 +, Tom Evans wrote:
> > Stage 3 - Email all OSM users who have contributed
>
> > data with the option of re-licensing their data
>
>
>
> If we're going to do this anyway, can we not allow users to mark their
> preference as public domain to
I guess this is why it's called "the hard bit".
Also ... The GPX traces were (presumably) uploaded under CCBYSA. Since
traces metadata was lost there is now roughly 25% of the trackpoints
with unknown contributors - no one to grant relicensing and unknow
"public" attribute. Should these traces als
On 04/02/2008 10:41, SteveC wrote:
> • Stage 4 - Remove all data from those who do not respond or respond
> negatively (the hard bit)
Steve, how do we avoid the situation where e.g. someone who disagrees
the new license has run a bot over all of Cambridge to tweak things (as
has indeed h
> Stage 3 - Email all OSM users who have contributed
> data with the option of re-licensing their data
If we're going to do this anyway, can we not allow users to mark their
preference as public domain too? It seems a significant number of OSM
participants may be perfect
6 matches
Mail list logo
