On 13 Jan 2014, at 11:15, Christian Quest cqu...@openstreetmap.fr wrote:
tags on relations can be seen as default values for the relation members, so
in such a case, the default tag is replaced by the member one.
I'm not saying it's right to do it that way, just a way to deal with data in
Guillaume Rischard wrote:
It looks like most of these are bad data, and I will attempt to fix
them all manually.
That definitely looks like the best approach...
Others make no sense whatsoever:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/238402296 (part of
Actual numbers would be about 1830 highway=* and about 490 railway=*
objects with type=route if you count only relations:
http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/22q
Martin
Taginfo finds type=route combined with 1374 instances of railway=*
(0.48%) and 6426 instances of highway=* (2.23%).
2014/1/13 Guillaume Rischard openstreet...@stereo.lu
Hello,
Several relations have both type=route and highway=* or railway=* tags; I
would like to remove the highway or railway tags from the relations, and
leave them on the members. The relation highway tags are redundant with the
member
Hello,
Several relations have both type=route and highway=* or railway=* tags; I would
like to remove the highway or railway tags from the relations, and leave them
on the members. The relation highway tags are redundant with the member ways,
make no semantic sense, and can cause rendering
5 matches
Mail list logo
