On Thu, 14 May 2009 12:48:48 +0100, Ken Guest wrote: > On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 8:39 PM, David Paleino <d.pale...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > However, I'd really stick to "amenity": those are meant as "facilities" > > (maybe "facility=" would be better? But then we would need to change a > > *lot* of > > tags out there) > > eh, so somebody would need to write some update rules for a bot to change > them. > I don't see the problem with regards to mass edits such as what would be > required here. > > It makes far more sense to use a sensible tag name that can best describe > what is required/being tagged.
Ok, great, but the proposal is really about a *=mortuary (or *=morgue) tag -- it could be "amenity", or "healthcare" (which is a key already proposed a while ago), or "facility", or anything else. I believe the important part of this proposal is the *value* -- not the particular key it would be associated to (i.e. I'm open to changing it to everything else, based on sound proposals/comments) David -- . ''`. Debian maintainer | http://wiki.debian.org/DavidPaleino : :' : Linuxer #334216 --|-- http://www.hanskalabs.net/ `. `'` GPG: 1392B174 ----|---- http://snipr.com/qa_page `- 2BAB C625 4E66 E7B8 450A C3E1 E6AA 9017 1392 B174
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
