Knut Arne Bjørndal wrote:
> "Raphael Studer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I've founde three relation proposals with nearly the seam aims.
>>
>> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Relations/Proposed/Boundaries
>> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Relations/Proposed/Country
>> http://wik
Hi,
> Btw: is there a clear procedure on how we make relation usages
> standard?
I believe the route relation has become standard by being used, and I'd
suggest the same for others ;-)
Bye
Frederik
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http:/
"Raphael Studer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I've founde three relation proposals with nearly the seam aims.
>
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Relations/Proposed/Boundaries
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Relations/Proposed/Country
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Rel
Hi,
I've founde three relation proposals with nearly the seam aims.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Relations/Proposed/Boundaries
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Relations/Proposed/Country
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Relations/Proposed/Is_In
I've also seen relations w
4 matches
Mail list logo