These days I've been busier than usual updating the Spanish version of the
"Good practice" page. Now I know why.
Thank you all.
Regards,
Daniel
--
Sent from: http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/General-Discussion-f5171242.html
___
talk mailing list
the bing imagery is from 2016, but i live where i map.
From: Joseph Eisenberg
Sent: Thursday, July 4, 2019 10:08 PM
To: Yves
Cc: osm
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Reordering and rewriting Good Practice wiki
page
I've
finished the new detailed page "Keep the History"
And so I've remove
I've finished the new detailed page "Keep the History"
And so I've removed the two paragraphs about specific JOSM plugins and
a way to move a node to a new area from the Good_practice page - they
are on the new page which is linked
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Keep_the_history
I would
Re: "Try to keep changesets to a manageable size, both in number of
changes and geographical scope."
This would be good to add to "Good changeset comments"
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
If a changeset covers a huge are or too many changes, it won't be easy
to
You are right. I've moved "Don't map temporary events and temporary
features" to it's own main heading after Verifiability.
I believe "Map what's on the ground", "Don't map historic events" and
"Don't map your local legislation..." are clearly related to
verifiability.
The later two reference
On 05/07/19 05:54, Jmapb wrote:
On 7/4/2019 12:40 AM, Warin wrote:
On the order of things.
Best to tell them what to do first. This provides some motivation.
Leave 'what not to do' for last, these tend to turn people away.
So I would do:
1 One feature, one OSM element
2 Good
On 7/4/2019 12:40 AM, Warin wrote:
On the order of things.
Best to tell them what to do first. This provides some motivation.
Leave 'what not to do' for last, these tend to turn people away.
So I would do:
1 One feature, one OSM element
2 Good changeset comments (+Keep the history)
3
On 04.07.19 05:53, Joseph Eisenberg wrote:
> 2 Verifiability (+Map what's on the ground, Don't map: historic
> events, temporary features, local legislation etc)
In my opinion, the practices that you've turned into subheadings of the
verifiability section are not merely special cases of
On 04.07.19 05:53, Joseph Eisenberg wrote:
I've reordered and reworded several sections of the Good practice
page: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice
On 04.07.2019 11:27, Frederik Ramm wrote:
I would prefer if far-reaching edits to essential pages that describe a
community
Hi,
On 04.07.19 05:53, Joseph Eisenberg wrote:
> I've reordered and reworded several sections of the Good practice
> page: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice
I would prefer if far-reaching edits to essential pages that describe a
community consensus would be made on a user page
It should be 'Don't map *incorrectly* to suit the renderer'
All tags can be used for rendering otherwise we'd just have black dots &
lines.
DaveF
On 04/07/2019 04:53, Joseph Eisenberg wrote:
I've reordered and reworded several sections of the Good practice
page:
sent from a phone
> On 4. Jul 2019, at 06:40, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> 3Editing Standards: (Align aerial imagery before tracing, Do not
> trace from outdated imagery... Keep straight ways straight ... Mark
> estimations with FIXME ... etc.)
I would remove the align
On the order of things.
Best to tell them what to do first. This provides some motivation.
Leave 'what not to do' for last, these tend to turn people away.
So I would do:
1 One feature, one OSM element
2 Good changeset comments (+Keep the history)
3 Editing Standards:
As mentioned, I plan to significantly shorten the "Keep the history"
section, with a link to the longer version at
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Keep_the_history instead.
I would probably support shortening the page even further, but I've
already had several edits reverted by other users
Hmm... I would be all in favor of extending the See also... section and shorten
drastically the page to keep it simple.
Some of the good practices there are second order, don't you think?
Keeping history compared to Tag for the renderer, for example.
Yves
Le 4 juillet 2019 05:53:23 GMT+02:00,
I've reordered and reworded several sections of the Good practice
page: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice
The page had grown over the years from 6 or 7 initial sections:
(First verion of page in 2008
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Good_practice=86242)
1) Don't
16 matches
Mail list logo
