Serge Wroclawski schrieb:
> On Sat, Sep 5, 2009 at 12:59 PM, Ulf Lamping
> wrote:
>
>> Please also note, that it's really easy to switch from OSM to Google
>> maps (and back) if you're using openlayers. But you have to rewrite your
>> javascript code (completely?) if you want to go from the Googl
On Sat, Sep 5, 2009 at 12:59 PM, Ulf Lamping wrote:
> Please also note, that it's really easy to switch from OSM to Google
> maps (and back) if you're using openlayers. But you have to rewrite your
> javascript code (completely?) if you want to go from the Google API to OSM.
>
> So OSM is the "sec
2009/9/6 Robert (Jamie) Munro :
> There's even a bookmarklet (OSMify) you can run to add Mapnik, OSMA and
> Cycle layers to most 3rd party Google maps sites:
> http://blog.johnmckerrell.com/2007/12/31/new-version-of-osmify-bookmarklet/
Has anyone turned this into a user script?
This would load i
Robert (Jamie) Munro schrieb:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Ulf Lamping wrote:
>> Please also note, that it's really easy to switch from OSM to Google
>> maps (and back) if you're using openlayers. But you have to rewrite your
>> javascript code (completely?) if you want
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ulf Lamping wrote:
>
> Please also note, that it's really easy to switch from OSM to Google
> maps (and back) if you're using openlayers. But you have to rewrite your
> javascript code (completely?) if you want to go from the Google API to OSM.
In
On Sat, 5 Sep 2009, Ian Dees wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 5, 2009 at 2:59 AM, Liz wrote:
> > SFD is using a well known proprietary map on their web site.
> > Is there anything in this which OSM or one of its derivatives can't do
> > already?
> >
> >
> > http://cgi.softwarefreedomday.org/2009/map.shtml
> >
andrzej zaborowski schrieb:
> 2009/9/5 Apollinaris Schoell :
>> For any external use like SFD it makes sense to stay with a commercial
>> solution where they can get paid support and customization if needed.
>
> My only issue with this is that it places OSM behind Google, because
> when you go to
2009/9/5 Apollinaris Schoell :
> For any external use like SFD it makes sense to stay with a commercial
> solution where they can get paid support and customization if needed.
My only issue with this is that it places OSM behind Google, because
when you go to their website you get an "official" wa
andrzej zaborowski wrote:
> 2009/9/5 Apollinaris Schoell :
>>> I agree, maybe it's worth to have a fundraiser for a separate,
>>> official mapnik server + super speedy hosting (unless the people
>>> involved with UCL think that we can have a reliable enough connection
>>> hosted free by UCL, or som
On 5 Sep 2009, at 8:40 , andrzej zaborowski wrote:
> 2009/9/5 Apollinaris Schoell :
>>> I agree, maybe it's worth to have a fundraiser for a separate,
>>> official mapnik server + super speedy hosting (unless the people
>>> involved with UCL think that we can have a reliable enough
>>> connecti
2009/9/5 Apollinaris Schoell :
>> I agree, maybe it's worth to have a fundraiser for a separate,
>> official mapnik server + super speedy hosting (unless the people
>> involved with UCL think that we can have a reliable enough connection
>> hosted free by UCL, or somebody else wants to offer reliab
>
> I agree, maybe it's worth to have a fundraiser for a separate,
> official mapnik server + super speedy hosting (unless the people
> involved with UCL think that we can have a reliable enough connection
> hosted free by UCL, or somebody else wants to offer reliable and free
> hosting). Since it
2009/9/5 Ulf Lamping :
> Jonathan Bennett schrieb:
>> Tobias Knerr wrote:
>>> How about "offer reliable service with good uptimes"? After the recent
>>> maintenance weekend it was stated that our services are not really
>>> intended for the public (at least if they need them and don't just
>>> expe
On Sat, Sep 5, 2009 at 2:59 AM, Liz wrote:
> SFD is using a well known proprietary map on their web site.
> Is there anything in this which OSM or one of its derivatives can't do
> already?
>
>
> http://cgi.softwarefreedomday.org/2009/map.shtml
>
> If we can duplicate these functions, then I'd su
On Sat, Sep 5, 2009 at 8:40 AM, Jonathan Bennett
> To put it another way: We will have succeeded not when the public uses
> openstreetmap.org instead of Google Maps, but when Google Maps uses
> OpenStreetMap data instead of Navteq, Teleatlas, or other proprietary
> data sources.
I'm somewhat new
Jonathan Bennett schrieb:
> Tobias Knerr wrote:
>> How about "offer reliable service with good uptimes"? After the recent
>> maintenance weekend it was stated that our services are not really
>> intended for the public (at least if they need them and don't just
>> experiment with them) and we are o
Tobias Knerr wrote:
> How about "offer reliable service with good uptimes"? After the recent
> maintenance weekend it was stated that our services are not really
> intended for the public (at least if they need them and don't just
> experiment with them) and we are only about data. If that's still
Tobias Knerr wrote:
> How about "offer reliable service with good uptimes"? After the recent
> maintenance weekend it was stated that our services are not really
> intended for the public (at least if they need them and don't just
> experiment with them) and we are only about data. If that's still
2009/9/5 Tobias Knerr :
> Liz wrote:
>> SFD is using a well known proprietary map on their web site.
>> Is there anything in this which OSM or one of its derivatives can't do
>> already?
>
> How about "offer reliable service with good uptimes"? After the recent
> maintenance weekend it was stated t
Liz wrote:
> SFD is using a well known proprietary map on their web site.
> Is there anything in this which OSM or one of its derivatives can't do
> already?
How about "offer reliable service with good uptimes"? After the recent
maintenance weekend it was stated that our services are not really
i
On Sat, 5 Sep 2009 19:08:04 +1000, Liz wrote:
> On Sat, 5 Sep 2009, David Paleino wrote:
> > On Sat, 5 Sep 2009 17:59:59 +1000, Liz wrote:
> > > SFD is using a well known proprietary map on their web site.
> > > Is there anything in this which OSM or one of its derivatives can't do
> > > already?
On Sat, 5 Sep 2009, David Paleino wrote:
> On Sat, 5 Sep 2009 17:59:59 +1000, Liz wrote:
> > SFD is using a well known proprietary map on their web site.
> > Is there anything in this which OSM or one of its derivatives can't do
> > already?
> >
> > http://cgi.softwarefreedomday.org/2009/map.shtml
On Sat, 5 Sep 2009 17:59:59 +1000, Liz wrote:
> SFD is using a well known proprietary map on their web site.
> Is there anything in this which OSM or one of its derivatives can't do
> already?
>
> http://cgi.softwarefreedomday.org/2009/map.shtml
>
> If we can duplicate these functions, then I'd
SFD is using a well known proprietary map on their web site.
Is there anything in this which OSM or one of its derivatives can't do
already?
http://cgi.softwarefreedomday.org/2009/map.shtml
If we can duplicate these functions, then I'd suggest a polite discussion with
SFD suggesting OSM for 20
24 matches
Mail list logo
