Lulu-Ann wrote: > > I would love to agree, but the needs of disabled persons are widely > spread over our tagging scheme anyway, and awareness of objects that refer to > accessibility is nearly zero. > > There are categories for visual, hearing and walking impariment, > colletcted in the category "accessibiliy". > > > > The ":blind" in my proposal as a postfix was an idea to approach what > you recommend.
John proposed: > accessibility:blind=* ? This does not help. Tell me the values, and I can tell you if they might work. I guess we will reach all non graphics interfaces, if we use description:language-abbrev.:blind = Description text in whole sentences. so any device can read out a full sentence on the found accessibility means. Regards Lulu-Ann -- Jetzt kostenlos herunterladen: Internet Explorer 8 und Mozilla Firefox 3.5 - sicherer, schneller und einfacher! http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/chbrowser _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
