Re: [OSM-talk] Tagging of jogging tracks

2008-05-09 Thread Inge Wallin
On Friday 09 May 2008 09:33:47 Mike Collinson wrote: At 10:24 PM 8/05/2008, Karl Eichwalder wrote: Inge Wallin schrieb: Yes, that is indeed what it is. I haven't tracked it yet, but there is also a mountain bike track in that area. I suppose that should be tagged: highway=cycleway

Re: [OSM-talk] Tagging of jogging tracks

2008-05-09 Thread Andy Allan
On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 8:33 AM, Mike Collinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: At 10:24 PM 8/05/2008, Karl Eichwalder wrote: Inge Wallin schrieb: Yes, that is indeed what it is. I haven't tracked it yet, but there is also a mountain bike track in that area. I suppose that should be tagged:

Re: [OSM-talk] Tagging of jogging tracks

2008-05-08 Thread Michael Collinson
At 02:23 PM 5/8/2008, Inge Wallin wrote: How should I tag a track in the woods that are designated for exercise like walking or jogging? I tried to read the page Map_Features in the wiki, but didn't really get much help. All the values for the 'sport' key are just applied to nodes and areas, not

Re: [OSM-talk] Tagging of jogging tracks

2008-05-08 Thread Inge Wallin
On Thursday 08 May 2008 15:17:31 Michael Collinson wrote: At 02:23 PM 5/8/2008, Inge Wallin wrote: This is a MotionspÄr area with several short to medium length tracks aimed individually at joggers/runners, health walkers, mountain bikers and sometimes cross-country skiers, often with

Re: [OSM-talk] Tagging of jogging tracks

2008-05-08 Thread Alex Mauer
Inge Wallin wrote: Yes, that is indeed what it is. I haven't tracked it yet, but there is also a mountain bike track in that area. I suppose that should be tagged: highway=cycleway sport=mountainbike Except... these are not really ways at all, but narrow tracks through the

Re: [OSM-talk] Tagging of jogging tracks

2008-05-08 Thread Alex Mauer
Karl Eichwalder wrote: Alex Mauer schrieb: I do not know what you actually want to do, but this sounds kind of dangerous. By all means, do not misuse keywords introduced and well established for different purposes. Always try to tag in a backwards compatible manner. highway=cycleway is

Re: [OSM-talk] Tagging of jogging tracks

2008-05-08 Thread Karl Eichwalder
Inge Wallin schrieb: Yes, that is indeed what it is. I haven't tracked it yet, but there is also a mountain bike track in that area. I suppose that should be tagged: highway=cycleway sport=mountainbike Except... these are not really ways at all, but narrow tracks through the woods

Re: [OSM-talk] Tagging of jogging tracks

2008-05-08 Thread Alex Mauer
Simon Ward wrote: Good parts of the national cycle network (often, but not always, alternate routes) in the UK are tracks hardly suitable for road bikes. They are still meant for bicycles. +1. The same can be said for designated cycle routes in countries which don't even have a national

Re: [OSM-talk] Tagging of jogging tracks

2008-05-08 Thread Karl Eichwalder
Simon Ward schrieb: On Thu, May 08, 2008 at 10:24:43PM +0200, Karl Eichwalder wrote: mountain bike track in that area. I suppose that should be tagged: highway=cycleway sport=mountainbike Except... these are not really ways at all, but narrow tracks through the woods that

Re: [OSM-talk] Tagging of jogging tracks

2008-05-08 Thread Martin Simon
Am Donnerstag, 8. Mai 2008 23:15:17 schrieb Alex Mauer: Simon Ward wrote: Good parts of the national cycle network (often, but not always, alternate routes) in the UK are tracks hardly suitable for road bikes. They are still meant for bicycles. +1. The same can be said for designated

Re: [OSM-talk] Tagging of jogging tracks

2008-05-08 Thread Alex Mauer
Martin Simon wrote: Cycle routes often use residential roads, agricultural tracks, primary/secondary/tertiary/unclassified roads and even footpaths. Of course. Obviously not all designated cycle routes are primarily designed for bicycles. My point was that poor physical condition of the