Hi,
I think that it's critical that work done by users up to now is not erased
or corrupted by a bulk upload of data.
Therefore the new Tiger data should not relpace users data nor should it be
placed on top of, underneath, or intertwined with the current users data.
Ideally, if a tile has been
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 9:44 PM, vegard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 12:27:27PM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
On Mon, 2008-10-20 at 09:43 +0200, vegard wrote:
I see it like this: What could be very useful to have, is a mapping
between tiger data (old set) and OSM data. It
Any idea about the differences between the Tiger data in the OSM db and
this new set? By that I mean: is it just road network updates or is the
data also better defined? The current tiger data in the db may look
alright on a map, but routing wise it is a real mess.
Dave Hansen wrote:
Has
On Sun, Oct 19, 2008 at 10:54:55AM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
Has anyone looked at importing the TIGER 2007 data yet? I was going to
start coding up the conversion utilities to get started. It appears
that this shapefile format may have existing OSM converters out there.
Anyone want to admit
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 2:43 AM, vegard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Oct 19, 2008 at 10:54:55AM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
Has anyone looked at importing the TIGER 2007 data yet? I was going to
start coding up the conversion utilities to get started. It appears
that this shapefile format
On Mon, 2008-10-20 at 09:21 +0200, Lambertus wrote:
Any idea about the differences between the Tiger data in the OSM db and
this new set? By that I mean: is it just road network updates or is the
data also better defined? The current tiger data in the db may look
alright on a map, but
On Mon, 2008-10-20 at 09:43 +0200, vegard wrote:
On Sun, Oct 19, 2008 at 10:54:55AM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
Has anyone looked at importing the TIGER 2007 data yet? I was going to
start coding up the conversion utilities to get started. It appears
that this shapefile format may have
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 12:27:27PM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
On Mon, 2008-10-20 at 09:43 +0200, vegard wrote:
I see it like this: What could be very useful to have, is a mapping
between tiger data (old set) and OSM data. It could be to late for this
round, but an external_id:tiger =
Has anyone looked at importing the TIGER 2007 data yet? I was going to
start coding up the conversion utilities to get started. It appears
that this shapefile format may have existing OSM converters out there.
Anyone want to admit to having one? ;)
-- Dave
9 matches
Mail list logo
