Re: [OSM-talk] Voting: traffic_enforcement

2008-10-17 Thread Ed Loach
> Haven't seen any cases where the same camera covers both > directions of a > dual carriageway, but if it happens somewhere, why not just add > two > nodes on each side? How about those cases where the camera is between the carriageways and gets swung around to cover opposite sides at irregular i

Re: [OSM-talk] Voting: traffic_enforcement

2008-10-17 Thread Ben Laenen
On Friday 17 October 2008, Tristan Scott wrote: > righto; votes cleared. proposal modified. new vote set in a week's > time. > > I'm not keen on the enforcement direction being forwards and > backwards. I can think of examples: > * Common mobile station on a bridge - on a way which has no relation

Re: [OSM-talk] Voting: traffic_enforcement

2008-10-17 Thread Sascha Silbe
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 06:40:12PM +0100, Tristan Scott wrote: * Common mobile station on a bridge - on a way which has no relation to the direction of enforcement In that case, a relation (no pun intended) would be better. * On a crossroads/traffic signals (red light camera) where two ways

Re: [OSM-talk] Voting: traffic_enforcement

2008-10-17 Thread Tristan Scott
Message - > > From: Tristan Scott > > To: Frederik Ramm > > Cc: talk@openstreetmap.org > > Sent: Friday, October 17, 2008 4:32 PM > > Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Voting: traffic_enforcement > > > > > > Hmm. noting the comments on votes about tag high

Re: [OSM-talk] Voting: traffic_enforcement

2008-10-17 Thread David Groom
> > - Original Message - > From: Tristan Scott > To: Frederik Ramm > Cc: talk@openstreetmap.org > Sent: Friday, October 17, 2008 4:32 PM > Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Voting: traffic_enforcement > > > Hmm. noting the comments on votes about tag highway it see

Re: [OSM-talk] Voting: traffic_enforcement

2008-10-17 Thread Tristan Scott
Hmm. noting the comments on votes about tag highway it seems that it would be a better scheme to use "traffic_enforcement=speed" instead of both "highway=traffic_enforcement" AND "enforcement_type=speed" Now - this isn't my proposal, I'm just rather keen and willing to try to help. What's the corr

Re: [OSM-talk] Voting: traffic_enforcement

2008-10-17 Thread Frederik Ramm
Hi, On 17.10.2008, at 13:46, Tristan Scott wrote: > I'd appreciate if lots of people could go vote on this so we can > have it approved - I for one would find it invaluable. Then don't wait - just use it. If there is *anything* you find invaluable, don't wait for others to say they find it to

[OSM-talk] Voting: traffic_enforcement

2008-10-17 Thread Tristan Scott
This is a voting request for traffic_enforcement (as no-one seems to know about it?) http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Proposed_features/Traffic_enforcement I'd appreciate if lots of people could go vote on this so we can have it approved - I for one would find it invaluable. Such an item i