Re: [OSM-talk] Way with only one single node

2012-03-21 Thread Richard Fairhurst
[copied to potlatch-dev, followups probably better there] Steve Bennett wrote: > One thing we could add (in addition to trying to fix bugs in the > various places 1-length ways could be created) would be a > general filter at save time that prevents any 1-length ways > being sent back to the datab

Re: [OSM-talk] Way with only one single node

2012-03-20 Thread Toby Murray
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 4:12 PM, Richard Fairhurst wrote: > Stephan Knauss wrote: >> Some editors create these ways. The most prominent one is Potlatch. >> The Ticket is open since two years. xybot trys to correct some of >> the problems until a bugfix is made in potlatch. > > xybot does not help

Re: [OSM-talk] Way with only one single node

2012-03-20 Thread ThomasB
Richard Fairhurst wrote > When someone identifies reliable steps to reproduce in P2, we try and fix > it and indeed have done in some cases IIRC > pretty easy. Just did it http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/156137152 -- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Way-wi

Re: [OSM-talk] Way with only one single node

2012-03-20 Thread Steve Bennett
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 8:12 AM, Richard Fairhurst wrote: > xybot does not help its cause by having the same ticket for Potlatch 1 and > Potlatch 2 (which are entirely different codebases and have different > components in trac). When someone identifies reliable steps to reproduce in > P2, we try

Re: [OSM-talk] Way with only one single node

2012-03-20 Thread Richard Fairhurst
Stephan Knauss wrote: > Some editors create these ways. The most prominent one is Potlatch. > The Ticket is open since two years. xybot trys to correct some of > the problems until a bugfix is made in potlatch. xybot does not help its cause by having the same ticket for Potlatch 1 and Potlatch 2

Re: [OSM-talk] Way with only one single node

2012-03-20 Thread Alan Mintz
At 2012-03-20 12:38, ThomasB wrote: I am wondering how a way with only one node can exist in the database. I have deleted it but how many still exist? http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/154820504/history It is, indeed, deleted. See the upper right corner of the page. As to how it got to e

Re: [OSM-talk] Way with only one single node

2012-03-20 Thread Stephan Knauss
On 20.03.2012 20:46, John F. Eldredge wrote: ThomasB wrote: I am wondering how a way with only one node can exist in the database. I have deleted it but how many still exist? http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/154820504/history Since it takes at least two points to define a line, a way wi

Re: [OSM-talk] Way with only one single node

2012-03-20 Thread John F. Eldredge
ThomasB wrote: > > John F. Eldredge wrote > > > > ThomasB wrote: > > > >> I am wondering how a way with only one node can exist in the > database. > >> I have > >> deleted it but how many still exist? > >> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/154820504/history > >> > > > > Si

Re: [OSM-talk] Way with only one single node

2012-03-20 Thread ThomasB
John F. Eldredge wrote > > ThomasB wrote: > >> I am wondering how a way with only one node can exist in the database. >> I have >> deleted it but how many still exist? >> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/154820504/history >> > > Since it takes at least two points to define

Re: [OSM-talk] Way with only one single node

2012-03-20 Thread John F. Eldredge
ThomasB wrote: > I am wondering how a way with only one node can exist in the database. > I have > deleted it but how many still exist? > http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/154820504/history > Since it takes at least two points to define a line, a way with only one node would be zero uni

[OSM-talk] Way with only one single node

2012-03-20 Thread ThomasB
I am wondering how a way with only one node can exist in the database. I have deleted it but how many still exist? http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/154820504/history -- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Way-with-only-one-single-node-tp5581022p5581022.html Sent f