[copied to potlatch-dev, followups probably better there]
Steve Bennett wrote:
> One thing we could add (in addition to trying to fix bugs in the
> various places 1-length ways could be created) would be a
> general filter at save time that prevents any 1-length ways
> being sent back to the datab
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 4:12 PM, Richard Fairhurst wrote:
> Stephan Knauss wrote:
>> Some editors create these ways. The most prominent one is Potlatch.
>> The Ticket is open since two years. xybot trys to correct some of
>> the problems until a bugfix is made in potlatch.
>
> xybot does not help
Richard Fairhurst wrote
> When someone identifies reliable steps to reproduce in P2, we try and fix
> it and indeed have done in some cases IIRC
>
pretty easy. Just did it
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/156137152
--
View this message in context:
http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Way-wi
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 8:12 AM, Richard Fairhurst wrote:
> xybot does not help its cause by having the same ticket for Potlatch 1 and
> Potlatch 2 (which are entirely different codebases and have different
> components in trac). When someone identifies reliable steps to reproduce in
> P2, we try
Stephan Knauss wrote:
> Some editors create these ways. The most prominent one is Potlatch.
> The Ticket is open since two years. xybot trys to correct some of
> the problems until a bugfix is made in potlatch.
xybot does not help its cause by having the same ticket for Potlatch 1 and
Potlatch 2
At 2012-03-20 12:38, ThomasB wrote:
I am wondering how a way with only one node can exist in the database. I have
deleted it but how many still exist?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/154820504/history
It is, indeed, deleted. See the upper right corner of the page.
As to how it got to e
On 20.03.2012 20:46, John F. Eldredge wrote:
ThomasB wrote:
I am wondering how a way with only one node can exist in the database.
I have
deleted it but how many still exist?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/154820504/history
Since it takes at least two points to define a line, a way wi
ThomasB wrote:
>
> John F. Eldredge wrote
> >
> > ThomasB wrote:
> >
> >> I am wondering how a way with only one node can exist in the
> database.
> >> I have
> >> deleted it but how many still exist?
> >> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/154820504/history
> >>
> >
> > Si
John F. Eldredge wrote
>
> ThomasB wrote:
>
>> I am wondering how a way with only one node can exist in the database.
>> I have
>> deleted it but how many still exist?
>> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/154820504/history
>>
>
> Since it takes at least two points to define
ThomasB wrote:
> I am wondering how a way with only one node can exist in the database.
> I have
> deleted it but how many still exist?
> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/154820504/history
>
Since it takes at least two points to define a line, a way with only one node
would be zero uni
I am wondering how a way with only one node can exist in the database. I have
deleted it but how many still exist?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/154820504/history
--
View this message in context:
http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Way-with-only-one-single-node-tp5581022p5581022.html
Sent f
11 matches
Mail list logo