Re: [OSM-talk] Who mapped it first with ref to forth coming deletions - implication

2011-12-14 Thread john whelan
So essentially all data that existed on this date will need to be deleted since we can't be sure who entered or edited it or if they have agreed to the new license if the .odbl database is to be clean. Cheerio John On 14 December 2011 11:31, 80n 80n...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at

Re: [OSM-talk] Who mapped it first with ref to forth coming deletions - implication

2011-12-14 Thread Richard Weait
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 1:15 PM, john whelan jwhelan0...@gmail.com wrote: So essentially all data that existed on this date will need to be deleted since we can't be sure who entered or edited it or if they have agreed to the new license if the .odbl database is to be clean. That's quite a

Re: [OSM-talk] Who mapped it first with ref to forth coming deletions - implication

2011-12-14 Thread David Groom
- Original Message - From: Richard Weait rich...@weait.com To: talk@openstreetmap.org Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2011 6:32 PM Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Who mapped it first with ref to forth coming deletions - implication On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 1:15 PM, john whelan

Re: [OSM-talk] Who mapped it first with ref to forth coming deletions - implication

2011-12-14 Thread Maarten Deen
On 14-12-2011 19:32, Richard Weait wrote: On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 1:15 PM, john whelanjwhelan0...@gmail.com wrote: So essentially all data that existed on this date will need to be deleted since we can't be sure who entered or edited it or if they have agreed to the new license if the .odbl

Re: [OSM-talk] Who mapped it first with ref to forth coming deletions - implication

2011-12-14 Thread Richard Fairhurst
Maarten Deen wrote: Well, since all history of that data before API v0.5 is lost Hey hey hey. Slow down. Data before API 0.5 is _not_ lost. It is archived. cheers Richard -- View this message in context:

Re: [OSM-talk] Who mapped it first with ref to forth coming deletions - implication

2011-12-14 Thread andrzej zaborowski
On 14 December 2011 20:14, Maarten Deen md...@xs4all.nl wrote: On 14-12-2011 19:32, Richard Weait wrote: On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 1:15 PM, john whelanjwhelan0...@gmail.com  wrote: So essentially all data that existed on this date will need to be deleted since we can't be sure who entered or

Re: [OSM-talk] Who mapped it first with ref to forth coming deletions - implication

2011-12-14 Thread Maarten Deen
On 14-12-2011 20:32, Richard Fairhurst wrote: Maarten Deen wrote: Well, since all history of that data before API v0.5 is lost Hey hey hey. Slow down. Data before API 0.5 is _not_ lost. It is archived. That is something different than what 80n said earlier, quoting a message from Frederik

Re: [OSM-talk] Who mapped it first with ref to forth coming deletions - implication

2011-12-14 Thread Richard Fairhurst
Maarten Deen wrote: That is something different than what 80n said earlier 80n, not for the first time, is wrong. So, which is it? Cleared and no details about any previous modifications or archived and earlier details available? You have to excuse the confusion, because these are