In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Steve Chilton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Incidentally, would it be possible for someone to patch osm2pgsql so
that instances of =true, =yes and =1 were seen to be the same thing?
That way there would be no need for long strings of AND =true, =yes and
=1 in
Cheers
STEVE
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Adrian Frith
Sent: Sun 2/10/2008 7:06 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc:
Subject: [OSM-talk] administrative boundaries that run along
roads - in the Mapnik layer
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Adrian Frith
Sent: Sun 2/10/2008 7:06 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc:
Subject: [OSM-talk] administrative boundaries that run along roads -
in the Mapnik layer
Hi All,
In Cape Town we've been mapping
Hi All,
In Cape Town we've been mapping the suburb boundaries (which are
official) as boundary=administrative admin_level=10. These boundaries
run often down the middle of roads, railways or rivers. They show up
very nicely on the Osmarender/[EMAIL PROTECTED] layer as dashed red lines - see
for
] on behalf of Adrian Frith
Sent: Sun 2/10/2008 7:06 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc:
Subject: [OSM-talk] administrative boundaries that run along roads - in
the Mapnik layer
Hi All,
In Cape Town we've been mapping the suburb
On 11/02/2008, Karl Eichwalder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why did I not think of that? (slaps head). In fact, I could put them in
as layer=5 which will put them on top of virtually any other conceivable
feature (like, a river underneath a three-layer highway intersection...)
In fact, I have
Why did I not think of that? (slaps head). In fact, I could put them in
as layer=5 which will put them on top of virtually any other conceivable
feature (like, a river underneath a three-layer highway intersection...)
In fact, I have a strange idea that osmarender may in fact put them on a
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Adrian Frith
Sent: Sun 2/10/2008 7:06 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc:
Subject: [OSM-talk] administrative boundaries that run along roads - in the Mapnik layer
Hi All,
In Cape Town we've been mapping the suburb boundaries
On Mon, 2008-02-11 at 10:46 +1300, Robin Paulson wrote:
I'd rather vote to prefer highways. Administrative boundaries are only
useful for... the administration.
maybe, maybe not. but if we represent them with a fine enough line,
they should not interfere with roads, which physically need
On Feb 11, 2008 12:19 AM, Adrian Frith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 2008-02-11 at 10:46 +1300, Robin Paulson wrote:
I'd rather vote to prefer highways. Administrative boundaries are only
useful for... the administration.
maybe, maybe not. but if we represent them with a fine
10 matches
Mail list logo
