Re: [OSM-talk] bridge vs tunnel

2014-12-29 Thread Michael Collinson
On 26/12/2014 22:46, Russ Nelson wrote: I think I've codified my rule for not-at-grade railway-highway interactions: if you could remove it with a crane, overhead is a bridge. If you need a backhoe, underneath is a tunnel. At least, that's the rule I plan to follow in the future. I've noticed a

[OSM-talk] bridge vs tunnel

2014-12-26 Thread Russ Nelson
I think I've codified my rule for not-at-grade railway-highway interactions: if you could remove it with a crane, overhead is a bridge. If you need a backhoe, underneath is a tunnel. At least, that's the rule I plan to follow in the future. I've noticed a few places where I didn't follow that rule