Usually I'm the one wringing my hands and plaintively saying "won't someone
think of the data consumers?". In this case though anyone who's not looking
for "natural=water; water=blah" (as well as any other options) really is doing
it wrong - people have been using that scheme for years.
Best
2019-06-29, št, 18:30 Mateusz Konieczny rašė:
>> How many maps, analysis, QA routines, presentations, documentations
>> have you created to come up with such a claim?
>
> To make such claim it is enough to look at tag statistics, history of usage
> and note that water=reservoir is generally not
29 Jun 2019, 15:42 by tomasstrau...@gmail.com:
> 2019-06-29, št, 15:53 Mateusz Konieczny rašė:
>
>>> Don't change/brake stuff that works.
>>>
>> Software supporting only landuse=reservoir or only water=reservoir for
>> detecting reservoirs is already broken and was broken for a long time.
>>
>
>
Don't worry about data consumers, they have a long habit of using concurrent
tagging schemes and make extensive use of 'OR'.
Yves
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
2019-06-29, št, 15:53 Mateusz Konieczny rašė:
>> Don't change/brake stuff that works.
> Software supporting only landuse=reservoir or only water=reservoir for
> detecting reservoirs is already broken and was broken for a long time.
How many maps, analysis, QA routines, presentations,
29 Jun 2019, 14:08 by tomasstrau...@gmail.com:
>> (1) most of lead of landuse=reservoir for areas is a result of a bot edit,
>> maybe an import
>>
>
> How do you know that?
>
See spike in the orange line on the left.
>> (2) since 2016 water=reservoir is growing much faster than
6 matches
Mail list logo
