Re: [OSM-talk] power=line

2009-03-23 Thread Pierre-André Jacquod
Ed Loach wrote: > Hatto wrote: > >> According to the "map features" the tag power=line may be >> completed by a tag >> "wires=single|double|triple|quad". I have some doubts about the >> meaning of >> "wires" in this case. "Map features" say about the "wires" tag: >> >>> Number of wires per power c

Re: [OSM-talk] power=line

2009-03-23 Thread Hatto von Hatzfeld
Ed Loach wrote: > Hatto wrote: > >> Because of the scarce documentation of "power=cables" some >> people started to tag e.g. "wires=6*single". I think this should be >> changed to cable=6, wires=single. Am I right? > > I think you are correct (assuming you meant cables=6). The photo on > the Key

Re: [OSM-talk] power=line

2009-03-23 Thread Ed Loach
Hatto wrote: > According to the "map features" the tag power=line may be > completed by a tag > "wires=single|double|triple|quad". I have some doubts about the > meaning of > "wires" in this case. "Map features" say about the "wires" tag: > > > Number of wires per power cable. "single" (1), "doub

[OSM-talk] power=line

2009-03-23 Thread Hatto von Hatzfeld
According to the "map features" the tag power=line may be completed by a tag "wires=single|double|triple|quad". I have some doubts about the meaning of "wires" in this case. "Map features" say about the "wires" tag: > Number of wires per power cable. "single" (1), "double" (2), "triple" (3) > or "