On Sat, Oct 4, 2008 at 6:34 AM, Dave Stubbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> >
> > I think my idea deals with non-obvious vandalism very well.
> > A user of the data can choose to use data that has only certain
> > tags by certain groups or individuals and therefore have an idea of how
> > accurate tha
>
> I think my idea deals with non-obvious vandalism very well.
> A user of the data can choose to use data that has only certain
> tags by certain groups or individuals and therefore have an idea of how
> accurate that data might be.
>
Yes, but in a world of 65000 users you're left with a lot le
On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 8:49 PM, Dave Stubbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 12:25 PM, Barnett, Phillip
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > vegard wrote:
> >> But we'll need a more permanent measure against vandalism.
> >> Something that'll make it easy to reverse things.
> >
> > Bu
On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 12:25 PM, Barnett, Phillip
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> vegard wrote:
>> But we'll need a more permanent measure against vandalism.
>> Something that'll make it easy to reverse things.
>
> But note that our most potent weapon against vandalism is the ease and
> speed with whi
EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Frederik Ramm
Sent: 03 October 2008 11:25
To: vegard
Cc: talk@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] vandolism on OSM
Hi,
vegard wrote:
> But we'll need a more permanent measure against vandalism.
> Something that'll make it easy to reverse things.
B
On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 7:24 PM, Frederik Ramm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> vegard wrote:
> > But we'll need a more permanent measure against vandalism.
> > Something that'll make it easy to reverse things.
>
> We have some good changes in store with API 0.6.
>
> > An idea I've had, is to a
Hi,
vegard wrote:
> But we'll need a more permanent measure against vandalism.
> Something that'll make it easy to reverse things.
We have some good changes in store with API 0.6.
> An idea I've had, is to add "revised"-tags to OSM data.
Which is what Wikipedia is currently experimenting with.
On Fri, Oct 03, 2008 at 02:51:01AM -0700, Nicholas Vetrovec wrote:
> Check out this Chicago area totally messed up by user: Mekhyl
> http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=41.9626&lon=-87.8045&zoom=14&layers=0B00FTF
> What to do about this problem??
>
Reversing these actual changes, I'm sure someone c
2008/10/3 Nicholas Vetrovec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Check out this Chicago area totally messed up by user: Mekhyl
>
> http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=41.9626&lon=-87.8045&zoom=14&layers=0B00FTF
> What to do about this problem??
>
Wouldn't call it vandalism, just an accident.
I believe their is a
Check out this Chicago area totally messed up by user: Mekhyl
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=41.9626&lon=-87.8045&zoom=14&layers=0B00FTF
What to do about this problem??
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listin
10 matches
Mail list logo
